2010
DOI: 10.12693/aphyspola.118.596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size Effect in Photofield Emission

Abstract: This paper contains a short reconsideration and explanation of the effect of photofield emission-current deviations. Theoretical considerations of the dynamic image-potential barrier did not yield a satisfactory result. A certain interpretation, suggested a few years ago, indicated that the photocurrent deviations reflect quantum-well states of the outer microcrystal of the apex of the field emitter. This point of view covers a variety of photocurrent deviations observed both for the integral field emission an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also interesting that a nano-surface phase with its normal dimension d s,h of few angstroms can be treated as a quantum well. A nano-surface phase of such a thickness clearly corresponds to the field-emitter tip ending of the minimum thickness d responsible for the photoelectron emission oscillations [30]. Other quantum size effects (quantum wells) were also observed experimentally [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Basic Surface Phase Parametersmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It is also interesting that a nano-surface phase with its normal dimension d s,h of few angstroms can be treated as a quantum well. A nano-surface phase of such a thickness clearly corresponds to the field-emitter tip ending of the minimum thickness d responsible for the photoelectron emission oscillations [30]. Other quantum size effects (quantum wells) were also observed experimentally [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Basic Surface Phase Parametersmentioning
confidence: 83%