2010
DOI: 10.1021/nl101700j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size Effect of Ruthenium Nanoparticles in Catalytic Carbon Monoxide Oxidation

Abstract: Carbon monoxide oxidation over ruthenium catalysts has shown an unusual catalytic behavior. Here we report a particle size effect on CO oxidation over Ru nanoparticle (NP) catalysts. Uniform Ru NPs with a tunable particle size from 2 to 6 nm were synthesized by a polyol reduction of Ru(acac)3 precursor in the presence of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) stabilizer. The measurement of catalytic activity of CO oxidation over two-dimensional Ru NPs arrays under oxidizing reaction conditions (40 Torr CO and 100 Torr O2) sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
347
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 390 publications
(359 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
347
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower activity of smaller particles in the CO hydrogenation reaction (typically studied using polydispersed catalysts of different loadings to give some control of particle size) has typically been attributed to a greater susceptibility to oxidation, 18 and it is known for other metals that this is the case for colloidally prepared nanoparticles, such as Ru or Rh. 19,20 The turnover frequency (TOF) for the larger particles of around 0.1 CO 2 molecules (surface Co atom) −1 s −1 at 250°C is of a similar magnitude to the TOF data by Weatherbee and Bartholomew for their 15 wt % Co/SiO 2 catalyst prepared by incipient wetness (after extrapolation using the E a values they report for reactant pressures of 1 and 11 bar). 9 However the E a of around 75 ± 7 kJ mol −1 that is obtained for all particle sizes (by an Arrhenius fit of the data presented in Figure 4, see Supporting Information) appears lower than that reported, although direct comparison is not straightforward.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…The lower activity of smaller particles in the CO hydrogenation reaction (typically studied using polydispersed catalysts of different loadings to give some control of particle size) has typically been attributed to a greater susceptibility to oxidation, 18 and it is known for other metals that this is the case for colloidally prepared nanoparticles, such as Ru or Rh. 19,20 The turnover frequency (TOF) for the larger particles of around 0.1 CO 2 molecules (surface Co atom) −1 s −1 at 250°C is of a similar magnitude to the TOF data by Weatherbee and Bartholomew for their 15 wt % Co/SiO 2 catalyst prepared by incipient wetness (after extrapolation using the E a values they report for reactant pressures of 1 and 11 bar). 9 However the E a of around 75 ± 7 kJ mol −1 that is obtained for all particle sizes (by an Arrhenius fit of the data presented in Figure 4, see Supporting Information) appears lower than that reported, although direct comparison is not straightforward.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…17 Ruthenium has interesting catalytic properties for CO oxidation if prepared in the form of nanoparticles of diameter between 2 nm and 6 nm. 18 The reason for size dependence is still not entirely clear and has been debated for a long time. However, there are cases in which a combination of theoretical and experimental work has elucidated the role of different types of sites in the catalytic activity, whose abundance is related to particle size and structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available uniform nanoparticles will allow one to carry out more precise measurements of size dependence in catalytic tests in future work. Joo et al [104] synthesized uniform Ru nanoparticles ranging from 2.1 to 6.0 nm by a polyol reduction of Ru(acac) 3 precursor in the presence of a PVP stabilizer and further investigated their catalytic activity for CO oxidation. The CO oxidation activity was interestingly found to increase with particle size (as opposed to the common observation -the smaller the better -in many reactions), with the 6.0-nm Ru nanoparticle catalyst showing an 8-fold higher activity than the 2.1-nm catalysts.…”
Section: Size Control Of Metal Nanoparticles and Effects On Catalysismentioning
confidence: 99%