1995
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(1995)7:1(19)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size Effects in Visually Graded Softwood Structural Lumber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Madsen (1990) reported a size adjustment factor according to depth of 0.25 for the defect-free wood member not in structural lumber. Barrett et al (1995) showed that the size factor for bending was in the range of 0.14∼0.26 and this study's result was in general agreement with their range and that published in the literature, as shown in Table 5. Therefore, the present study result of decreasing lumber strength with increasing member depth was considered consistent evidence for the depth effect in bending of domestic structural lumber.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Madsen (1990) reported a size adjustment factor according to depth of 0.25 for the defect-free wood member not in structural lumber. Barrett et al (1995) showed that the size factor for bending was in the range of 0.14∼0.26 and this study's result was in general agreement with their range and that published in the literature, as shown in Table 5. Therefore, the present study result of decreasing lumber strength with increasing member depth was considered consistent evidence for the depth effect in bending of domestic structural lumber.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Size effect of bending strength for wood members was studied extensively by several researchers (Bohannan, 1966;Johnson et al, 1989;Madsen, 1990;Barrett and Lau, 1994;Barrett et al, 1995). Test results revealed that strength of wood was influenced by size of members, and size effect based on strength data might be considered in timber design.…”
Section: Introduction 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Small-scale comparisons for a limited number of specimens were carried out by Almazán et al (2008) for German pine graded by DIN 4074 and UNE 56544 or by Riberholt (2008) for European spruce graded according to Chinese visual rules. Visual grading is addressed in several available CIB-W18 timber structures publications (Fewell 1984;Uzielli 1986;Barrett et al 1992;Stapel et al 2010), but none of these focused on the comparison of different grading rules and the assignment according to EN 1912. Verification of the validity of grading standards for such large growth areas as CNE is the main goal of the present article. Softwoods (spruce, pine, larch, Douglas fir, and Sitka spruce) will be graded and tested in tension or by edgewise bending.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During testing, the instantaneous tensile load along the length of the test specimen is considered constant. Madsen (1992) and Barrett et al (1995) provided comprehensive reviews of length effect studies on the tensile strength of lumber. Past experimental studies (Lam and Varoglu 1990, Madsen 1990, Showalter et al 1987) demonstrated that tensile strength of lumber was member length dependent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%