2013
DOI: 10.1515/hf-2013-0042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of visual strength grading of timber with respect to origin, species, cross section, and grading rules: a critical evaluation of the common standards

Abstract: Strength grading is essential for the efficient use of structural timber. Although international standards exist for machine strength grading, visual grading is still regulated based on national rules, which are expected to allow safe and economic grading results. Although there are large differences in the graded output because the species, the cross section, and the origin of the timber influence the results, some of these standards are considered to be applicable universally. The present article demonstrate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Graders should follow specific rules to categorize the assessed lumber, which would in turn indicate its strength (Thelandersson and Larsen, 2003). Depending on the country or region, different rules are used for visual grading, which may result in differences in lumber yield and mechanical properties when compared to measured values (Stapel and van de Kuilen, 2014). Despite being adopted throughout the world due to its simplicity (Ridley-Ellis et al, 2016), visual grading presents disadvantages, such as the reliance on the grader's experience, being based on the assumption that lumber of similar appearance has similar mechanical properties, and the inefficiency due to the fact that physical properties such as wood density and strength are not taken into consideration during the assessment.…”
Section: Wood Properties and Expected Financial Gains By Sawmillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graders should follow specific rules to categorize the assessed lumber, which would in turn indicate its strength (Thelandersson and Larsen, 2003). Depending on the country or region, different rules are used for visual grading, which may result in differences in lumber yield and mechanical properties when compared to measured values (Stapel and van de Kuilen, 2014). Despite being adopted throughout the world due to its simplicity (Ridley-Ellis et al, 2016), visual grading presents disadvantages, such as the reliance on the grader's experience, being based on the assumption that lumber of similar appearance has similar mechanical properties, and the inefficiency due to the fact that physical properties such as wood density and strength are not taken into consideration during the assessment.…”
Section: Wood Properties and Expected Financial Gains By Sawmillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concurrently, we took into account that local defects such as knots become more frequent with board length and that timber strength accordingly decreases (Isaksson and Thelandersson 1995;Øvrum et al 2011;Rais and Van de Kuilen 2017). Similarly, the cross section of sawn timber might influence sawn timber's mechanical properties (Barrett and Fewell 1990;Denzler 2007;Stapel andVan de Kuilen 2013, 2014). The sawing pattern was identical to logs of all diameters, i.e., the amount of large boards (cross section 50 × 150 mm 2 ) was maximized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is currently a diversity of standards for visual grading of timber that fit under the harmonised standard EN14081, and which vary in grading results (Stapel and van de Kuilen 2014). A common visual grading standard would be useful, from the perspective of ease of trade throughout Europe.…”
Section: European Visual Grading Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%