2014
DOI: 10.1080/21663831.2014.924164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-Induced Strengthening in Nanostructured Mg Alloy Micropillars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All micropillars are slightly tapered as a result of the annular cutting method by FIB. However, we achieved angles ≤1.5°, which are smaller than the values reported in the literature (2-5°) for typical micropillars machined by FIB [36]. In any case, to avoid any overestimation of the measured stress due to the tapering, the diameter is considered at half-height of the micropillar (∼ 4 μm).…”
Section: Contents Lists Available At Sciencedirectmentioning
confidence: 41%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All micropillars are slightly tapered as a result of the annular cutting method by FIB. However, we achieved angles ≤1.5°, which are smaller than the values reported in the literature (2-5°) for typical micropillars machined by FIB [36]. In any case, to avoid any overestimation of the measured stress due to the tapering, the diameter is considered at half-height of the micropillar (∼ 4 μm).…”
Section: Contents Lists Available At Sciencedirectmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…In any case, to avoid any overestimation of the measured stress due to the tapering, the diameter is considered at half-height of the micropillar (∼ 4 μm). Micropillar size was also carefully selected ∼4 μm to avoid sizeinduced strengthening, as we have demonstrated in previous works [36,37], and to provide results comparable with those from macro scale tests of Mg alloys. The images on the right hand side of Fig.…”
Section: Contents Lists Available At Sciencedirectmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Mechanical tests at the micron or sub-micron scale usually lead to an overestimation of the yield strength as compared with the bulk properties [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. This "size effect" is related to the limited number of mobile dislocations and/or to the scarcity of dislocation sources in the small volume, and the critical size of the micropillar to determine the bulk properties depend on the particular alloy and microstructure.…”
Section: Effect Of Zn and Ca On The Crsssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strengthening effects in nanocrystalline materials due to sample size have experimentally been found in micropillar tests and a variation of sample size for fixed grain sizes (e.g. [61,62]). With increasing deformation, the stresses show a slight decrease 1 are assumed to be fixed, where the dislocation glide accounts for approximately 75% of the external strain ε = 0.1, see figure 9(a).…”
Section: Fourth-order Strain-gradient Phase Mixture Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As soon as heterogeneities or incompatibilities are present, this results in gradient effects which can be captured with a non-local extension of such models [48]. Additionally, sample size dependence has been reported for nanocrystalline materials [61,62] which requires the incorporation of a length scale into the model. Stress-strain curves for the phase mixture model augmented with a second-order gradient term with a negative coefficient according to equation (4) are displayed in figure 4.…”
Section: Second-order Strain-gradient Phase Mixture Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%