2009
DOI: 10.5194/acp-9-3881-2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size resolved dust emission fluxes measured in Niger during 3 dust storms of the AMMA experiment

Abstract: Abstract. During the 2006 and 2007 special observing periods of the African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis campaign an original experimental system has been implemented in Banizoumbou (Niger) for measuring the size-resolved dust emission flux in natural conditions and documenting the possible influence of wind speed on its size distribution. The instrumental set-up, associated methodology, and the quality tests applied to the data set are described before the results acquired during 2 events of the Monsoon… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
143
2
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(36 reference statements)
16
143
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The flux-gradient method was used to estimate microbial fluxes from concentrations measured with the Burkard samplers. This methodology has been widely used to measure atmospheric fluxes of different scalars such as hydrogen (Meredith et al, 2014), nitrates and nitrogen compounds (Beine et al, 2003;Griffith and Galle, 2000;Taylor et al, 1999), mercury (Edwards et al, 2005;Fritsche et al, 2008;Lindberg et al, 1995), and particulate matter (Bonifacio et al, 2013;Kjelgaard et al, 2004;Park et al, 2011;Sow et al, 2009). The method follows the Monin-Obukhov similarity theory (Monin and Obukhov, 1954) and therefore assumes that in the atmospheric surface layer the flux of a certain scalar is a function of the gradient of the scalar measured at different heights, the heights themselves (z i ), and a transport velocity that is dependent on atmospheric turbulence and stability (a more detailed description of the methodology is provided in the Supplement).…”
Section: Flux Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flux-gradient method was used to estimate microbial fluxes from concentrations measured with the Burkard samplers. This methodology has been widely used to measure atmospheric fluxes of different scalars such as hydrogen (Meredith et al, 2014), nitrates and nitrogen compounds (Beine et al, 2003;Griffith and Galle, 2000;Taylor et al, 1999), mercury (Edwards et al, 2005;Fritsche et al, 2008;Lindberg et al, 1995), and particulate matter (Bonifacio et al, 2013;Kjelgaard et al, 2004;Park et al, 2011;Sow et al, 2009). The method follows the Monin-Obukhov similarity theory (Monin and Obukhov, 1954) and therefore assumes that in the atmospheric surface layer the flux of a certain scalar is a function of the gradient of the scalar measured at different heights, the heights themselves (z i ), and a transport velocity that is dependent on atmospheric turbulence and stability (a more detailed description of the methodology is provided in the Supplement).…”
Section: Flux Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in summertime the Sahel is a source region of mineral dust emitted by soil erosion during the passage of mesoscale convective systems or by intense monsoon winds (Sow et al, 2009). These additional emissions occur on human-disturbed soils only (Rajot and Valentin, 2001) and therefore may be considered to be anthropogenic in origin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8(d), the peak value of dN/dlogD p for pollution events was up to 1500 # cm -3 at 0.7 µm. During dust events, the peak value was below 200 # cm -3 at around 1.0 µm (Sow et al, 2009). The variation in dN/dlogD p was very small at diameters of 0.5-2.0 µm, as indicated by Sow et al (2009).…”
Section: Comparison Of Aerosol Properties Of Dust Events and Air Pollmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…During dust events, the peak value was below 200 # cm -3 at around 1.0 µm (Sow et al, 2009). The variation in dN/dlogD p was very small at diameters of 0.5-2.0 µm, as indicated by Sow et al (2009). Large differences in dN/dlogD p between dust and air pollution events occurred at around 1.0-2.0 µm, and dN/dlogD p was ~10 times higher for fine-mode particles during air pollution events than during dust events.…”
Section: Comparison Of Aerosol Properties Of Dust Events and Air Pollmentioning
confidence: 99%