2017
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skeletal and dental effects of Class III orthopaedic treatment: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: To summarise the skeletal, dental and soft tissue effects of orthopaedic treatment on growing skeletal class III patients compared with a concurrent untreated similar control group and to evaluate whether the design of the primary studies may affect the results. A literature search was performed up to the end of February 2016. No restrictions were applied concerning language and appliances. Once the quality score was assessed, a meta-analysis was performed for the appliances used in more than three studies. A … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
45
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A precise diagnosis is essential for choosing the correct therapy and determining the prognosis adequately. Therefore, orthodontic treatment planning requires an accurate prediction of the amount and direction of craniofacial development [2][3][4]. Since Broadbent [5] introduced lateral cephalometric radiography in 1931, studies on craniofacial growth and development have increased in number and many researchers have suggested definitions and norms for the normal occlusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A precise diagnosis is essential for choosing the correct therapy and determining the prognosis adequately. Therefore, orthodontic treatment planning requires an accurate prediction of the amount and direction of craniofacial development [2][3][4]. Since Broadbent [5] introduced lateral cephalometric radiography in 1931, studies on craniofacial growth and development have increased in number and many researchers have suggested definitions and norms for the normal occlusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One systematic review investigated the different treatments of Angle Class III malocclusion in adults, but only two studies that evaluated surgical interventions were included, since the review included solely randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials [19]. At the same time, several systematic reviews investigated the effects of Class III malocclusion treatment in growing patients with different treatment approaches [18,[20][21][22]. Despite a wide bibliographic search, we only found nine studies, and all of them were retrospective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there is very little evidence in the literature on the long‐term effects of changes produced by a facemask, which necessitates further studies that provide information on this point (Rongo et al, ; Woon & Thiruvenkatachari, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%