1991
DOI: 10.1086/285149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skewed Brood Sex Ratio and Sex-Biased Hatching Sequence in Harris's Hawks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, male-biased offspring sex ratios earlier in the season have been reported in Haris' hawk (Parabuteo unicinctus) (Bednartz and Hayden 1991) and American kestrels (Falco sparverius paulus) (Smallwood and Smallwood 1998), while in marsh harriers (Circus aerinosus) the offspring sex ratio is male-biased later in the season (Zijlstra et al 1992). The change in sex ratio in Haris' hawks involves sequential clutches, where the sex ratio of the first clutch is biased toward males and the offspring in this first clutch are larger than those in subsequent clutches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, male-biased offspring sex ratios earlier in the season have been reported in Haris' hawk (Parabuteo unicinctus) (Bednartz and Hayden 1991) and American kestrels (Falco sparverius paulus) (Smallwood and Smallwood 1998), while in marsh harriers (Circus aerinosus) the offspring sex ratio is male-biased later in the season (Zijlstra et al 1992). The change in sex ratio in Haris' hawks involves sequential clutches, where the sex ratio of the first clutch is biased toward males and the offspring in this first clutch are larger than those in subsequent clutches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charnov and Bull (1977) (see also Bull 1981) expanded condition-dependent sex allocation to environmental sex determination, providing an adaptive hypothesis for the occurrence of temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) that proposes developmental temperature is the fitness-altering condition that determines investment in ovaries or testes (Gutzke and Crews 1988; Janzen 1995;Shine 1999;Warner and Shine 2008). Condition dependence in sex allocation has been expanded to sex biases based on individual size, paternal quality, parental rank, hatching order, and season (Werren and Charnov 1978;Charnov 1979a;Burley 1981;Silk 1983;Bednarz and Hayden 1991;Daan et al 1996).According to sex allocation theory, sex allocation should be based on individual condition relative to the condition of competitors, not on absolute condition (Charnov et al , 1981 Charnov 1982;West 2009). The TW hypothesis predicts that mothers of relatively good condition should invest more in sons than mothers of relatively poor condition (Trivers and Willard 1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charnov and Bull (1977) (see also Bull 1981) expanded condition-dependent sex allocation to environmental sex determination, providing an adaptive hypothesis for the occurrence of temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) that proposes developmental temperature is the fitness-altering condition that determines investment in ovaries or testes (Gutzke and Crews 1988;Janzen 1995;Shine 1999;Warner and Shine 2008). Condition dependence in sex allocation has been expanded to sex biases based on individual size, paternal quality, parental rank, hatching order, and season (Werren and Charnov 1978;Charnov 1979a;Burley 1981;Silk 1983;Bednarz and Hayden 1991;Daan et al 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of raptors have demonstrated biased sex allocation with respect to laying date (Dijkstra et al 1990;Olsen & Cockburn 1991;Zijlstra et al 1992;Daan et al 1996), laying sequences within broods (Bortolotti 1986;Edwards et al 1988;Bednarz & Hayden 1991;Leroux & Bretagnolle 1996) and maternal condition (Wiebe & Bortolotti 1992). Although these studies explained adaptive sex ratio manipulation at the individual level, they also reported overall male-biased sex ratios of nestlings or fledglings at the population level, with the except of one study (Dijkstra et al 1990).…”
Section: Other Important Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%