2006
DOI: 10.1243/09544100g03204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skid-to-turn missile autopilot design using scheduled eigenstructure assignment technique

Abstract: This paper presents an application of adaptive control techniques to the design of skid-to-turn missile autopilot. The involved simplified adaptive controller is developed by combining gain scheduling approach with the eigenstructure assignment control design. A linear interpolation method is proposed to generate linear parameter-varying controller from a finite set of linear time-invariant controllers. Results of simulations are reported to demonstrate the performance, stability, and robustness of the conside… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8][9][10][11] The control objective is to force the air vehicle to track a desired motion path generated by the guidancenavigation system as the reference acceleration commands for the center of mass. The problem is first formulated and performance objectives are specified.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[8][9][10][11] The control objective is to force the air vehicle to track a desired motion path generated by the guidancenavigation system as the reference acceleration commands for the center of mass. The problem is first formulated and performance objectives are specified.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical approach being to design a controller for a certain point and then to schedule the controller's gain to place eigenvalues deep in the left half plane and the near real-axis according to measured or derived parameters that represent flight conditions, such as angle of attack or Mach number. 8) In another method, H 1 methods are invoked to design a collection of controllers, where, for each operating point in the flight envelope grid, a controller with a fixed structure results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mehrabian et al [11] have modelled an actuator with second-order dynamics for a tail-controlled missile to study a STT missile autopilot design using adaptive control methodology based on eigen-structure assignment wherein the response of the missile is assessed by tail fin deflection and pitching rate. Reichert [12] has designed an autopilot for a tail-fin controlled missile using dynamic scheduling in which the actuator is modelled with second-order dynamics and has analysed the system performance for a series of commanded manoeuvres at varying speeds in terms of missile angle of attack only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many possible ways of dealing with the control of such linear and time varying plants. The classical approach is to design a controller for a certain point and then to schedule the controller's gain to place eigenvalues deep in the left half plane and the near real-axis according to a measured or derived parameters that represent flight conditions, such as angle of attack or Mach number [1]. In another method, H ∞ methods are invoked to design a collection of controllers, where, for each operating point in the flight envelope grid, a controller with a fixed structure results [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%