2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference 2016
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2016.7500744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skin strain fields at the shoulder joint for mechanical counter pressure space suit development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional landmark locations from the waist to the knee include: waist at front, back, left and right, the tenth rib, iliospinale anterius, max prominence, crotch level, maximum thigh, mid thigh and suprapatellar [10]. Many landmark methods have been developed to capture the body in a standard A-frame and dynamic postures, including the use 3D markers [1], stickers and markers [2,7], stamps [11], and light projection [12]. Incremental landmark spacing [2,8] and body crease lines [7] have also been used to track movement of the body.…”
Section: Landmarking and 3d Scanningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditional landmark locations from the waist to the knee include: waist at front, back, left and right, the tenth rib, iliospinale anterius, max prominence, crotch level, maximum thigh, mid thigh and suprapatellar [10]. Many landmark methods have been developed to capture the body in a standard A-frame and dynamic postures, including the use 3D markers [1], stickers and markers [2,7], stamps [11], and light projection [12]. Incremental landmark spacing [2,8] and body crease lines [7] have also been used to track movement of the body.…”
Section: Landmarking and 3d Scanningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple landmarking techniques from previous studies were analyzed for the waist-hip-thigh region of the body. Five landmark application tools were reviewed; stickers and washable markers [13], 3D landmarking [1], stamps [11], and light projection [12], along with six methods to landmark the body; traditional ISO landmark locations [10], crease and body lines [14,15], incremental spacing [2], landmarks printed on garments [16], reference grids [17,8], and stamped speckle patterns [18].…”
Section: Landmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there is no standard procedure for skin strain analysis. Different techniques and technologies have been used to this end: magnetic resonance imaging (Tran et al, 2007), optical coherence tomography (Hendriks et al, 2006), ultrasound (Hendriks et al, 2003), 3-D scanning (Van den Herrewegen et al, 2014), multiple-view stereo matching (Thabet et al, 2014;Kimura et al, 2008), motion capture systems (Mahmud et al, 2010) and digital image correlation (DIC) (Staloff et al, 2008;Evans and Holt, 2009;Miura et al, 2012;Yoneyama, 2010;Obropta and Newman, 2016). At the same time, the procedure to calculate skin strain depends on the technology used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the procedure to calculate skin strain depends on the technology used. The most commonly used procedures for this purpose combine optical techniques with finite strain theory and the strain gauge rosette method (Obropta Jr., 2015;Evans and Holt, 2009;Miura et al, 2012;Staloff et al, 2008). The finite strain theory combined with 3-D digital image correlation (3D-DIC) has been shown to be the most accurate method as it provides the highest spatial resolution to measure the skin strain field during movement (Miura et al, 2012;Obropta Jr., 2015;Staloff et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation