2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2013.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SLA-controlled interconnection charging in next generation networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, it is desired that the services are customizable in a user specific way (Blum, Magedanz, Schreiner, & Wahle, 2009) while providing complete independence from the underlying access, aggregation and core networks. On the other hand, end-to-end QoS requirements specified in SLAs are expected to be met by these networks without any performance degradation during the service life times (Stojanovic, Kostic-Ljubisavljevic, & Radonjic-Djogatovic, 2013). Furthermore, users are expecting to get these services in a cost effective way, while the providers aim to increase their profits.…”
Section: Opportunities and Challenges For Delivering Distributed Electronic Resources Via Next Generation Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, it is desired that the services are customizable in a user specific way (Blum, Magedanz, Schreiner, & Wahle, 2009) while providing complete independence from the underlying access, aggregation and core networks. On the other hand, end-to-end QoS requirements specified in SLAs are expected to be met by these networks without any performance degradation during the service life times (Stojanovic, Kostic-Ljubisavljevic, & Radonjic-Djogatovic, 2013). Furthermore, users are expecting to get these services in a cost effective way, while the providers aim to increase their profits.…”
Section: Opportunities and Challenges For Delivering Distributed Electronic Resources Via Next Generation Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the 3PIP algorithm often provides overengineered class selection as can be noticed for service request 5 when offered E2E delay is nearly three times better than requested, whereas PLR for that same request is almost perfectly matched. Costs per service class in Table 2 have been defined according to the domain hierarchy and the offered performance, bearing in mind guidelines in [20]. Fulfillment of all requested QoS metrics is reflected in a higher interconnection cost depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the 3pip Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the number of defined classes and metric specifications per class depend on the provider's policy, so various levels of QoS granularity may be expected on the E2E path. Similar QoS specification is used in [9], [10] and [20]. Class mapping is investigated on the two paths consisting of five and three domains respectively, i.e., A1-R1-C-R2-A2 and A3-R3-A4 according to Table 2.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the 3pip Performancementioning
confidence: 99%