2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slaughter weight rather than sex affects carcass cuts and tissue composition of Bisaro pigs

Abstract: Carcass cuts and tissue composition were assessed in Bisaro pigs (n = 64) from two sexes (31 gilts and 33 entire males) reared until three target slaughter bodyweights (BW) means: 17 kg, 32 kg, and 79 kg. Dressing percentage and backfat thickness increased whereas carcass shrinkage decreased with increasing BW. Slaughter weight affected most of the carcass cut proportions, except shoulder and thoracic regions. Bone proportion decreased linearly with increasing slaughter BW, while intermuscular and subcutaneous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As loin and backfat are main parts of middle cut products and there are no signi cant differences on the proportion of middle cut between barrow and sow. It seems that the barrows are fatter than sows, which is out of our expectations, and is con icting with the ndings of Álvarez-Rodríguez & Teixeira [17]. Recall the fact that the barrow is signi cantly heavier than sow on the weight of most cutting meats, which means the weight of carcass would have the same result.…”
Section: The Effect Of Sexsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As loin and backfat are main parts of middle cut products and there are no signi cant differences on the proportion of middle cut between barrow and sow. It seems that the barrows are fatter than sows, which is out of our expectations, and is con icting with the ndings of Álvarez-Rodríguez & Teixeira [17]. Recall the fact that the barrow is signi cantly heavier than sow on the weight of most cutting meats, which means the weight of carcass would have the same result.…”
Section: The Effect Of Sexsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Many large-scale breeding companies have quickly set up slaughterhouses, adding slaughter-cutting processes to the breeding industry chain to maximize their economic value. However, in the process of slaughtering and cutting, the proportion and variation of carcass cut productions, the comparison of cut products between different genotype and sex, and the range of net gain from carcass to cuts productions are rare investigated [17]. Nowadays, research on meat cutting has mainly focused on the cut of beef carcass [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of the squares was performed to obtain the total area. In addition, the backfat thickness was measured at the 11th rib (including the skin) with a vernier caliper in cm of the LD muscle, according to Álvarez-Rodríguez and Teixeira [ 31 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carcass dressing percentages were determined by dividing the carcass weight by its fasting weight. The carcass length according to Álvarez-Rodríguez and Teixeira [ 26 ], The thickness of the backfat was determined at the 11th rib (along with the skin) by using a vernier caliper on the longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL) muscle in centimeters. Carcasses were prepared into four lean cuts following Thai and USDA standards [ 3 ]: boston, loin, picnic, and ham.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%