2018
DOI: 10.22489/cinc.2018.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleep Arousal Detection Using End-to-End Deep Learning Method Based on Multi-Physiological Signals

Abstract: We propose an end-to-end deep learning method to detect sleep arousals, especially non-apnea sleep arousals, which is the aim of Physionet/CinC Challenge 2018. We use filtered multi-physiological signals as the input of the network without any other hand-crafted features. The network automatically selects the best features to match arousal targets that we want to identify, and outputs the test result. The proposed network architecture is a 35-layer convolutional neural network (CNN) with three parts: a linear … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15] Deep neural networks with LSTM 0.430 Warrick & Homsi [29] Scattering transform and recurrent neural network 0.375 Li at al. [18] End-to-end deep learning 0.315 Zabihi et al [20] 1D convolutional neural network 0.310 Zabihi et al [30] State distance analysis in phase space 0.190 (*) Submitted outside the time frame of the official stage of the 2018 Physionet challenge. The AUPRC is given for their internal test set, but not the official blind test set of the challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[15] Deep neural networks with LSTM 0.430 Warrick & Homsi [29] Scattering transform and recurrent neural network 0.375 Li at al. [18] End-to-end deep learning 0.315 Zabihi et al [20] 1D convolutional neural network 0.310 Zabihi et al [30] State distance analysis in phase space 0.190 (*) Submitted outside the time frame of the official stage of the 2018 Physionet challenge. The AUPRC is given for their internal test set, but not the official blind test set of the challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning methods can model large data-sets better than heuristic algorithms or algorithms based on other machine learning methods such as decision trees or logistic regression that assume an underlying structure to the model. Different deep learning methods are used in the 2018 Physionet challenge to detect non apean/hypopnea sleep arousals [15][16][17][18][19][20]. A good review of all the methods and models that were designed for the challenge as well as the clinical and demographic characteristics of the challenge dataset are also given in [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A signifcant relation is indicated by a positive correlation of selected parameters, whereas a negative correlation implies an inverse relationship. Te EEG signal's estimated capabilities include fve frequency bands delta (4.5-5.0 Hz), theta (5.5-8.5 Hz), alpha (5-5.9 Hz), sigma (13-16.5 H), and beta (13-16.5 H) (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). Te spectral power of ECG signals was investigated at fve diferent frequencies ranging from 0.33 Hz to 0.4 Hz.…”
Section: Physiological Signal Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Warrick and Nabhan Homsi [22] proposed identifying sleep arousal using PSG and recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Deep learning (DL) has recently been widely employed to analyze EEG and ECG signals, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for sleep stage scoring [23][24][25][26], and an end-to-end (e2e) deep learning method based on multiphysiological inputs [27]. Tsinalis et al [28] used timefrequency analysis and stacked sparse auto-encoders (AEs) to create an autonomous sleep stage grading system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%