2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49703-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleep stage classification from heart-rate variability using long short-term memory neural networks

Abstract: Automated sleep stage classification using heart rate variability (HRV) may provide an ergonomic and low-cost alternative to gold standard polysomnography, creating possibilities for unobtrusive home-based sleep monitoring. Current methods however are limited in their ability to take into account long-term sleep architectural patterns. A long short-term memory (LSTM) network is proposed as a solution to model long-term cardiac sleep architecture information and validated on a comprehensive data set (292 partic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
111
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
6
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current state-of-the-art results extract dozens, if not hundreds, of expert-informed engineered features from physiological signals such as ECG/PPG and then use these as inputs to complex machine learning models to predict sleep stages [19][20][21][22] . The models either use features of neighboring time epochs explicitly to predict the stage for each time epoch 19 or use implicitly temporal models such as recurrent neural networks (RNNs) 20 . Such models have two important drawbacks that we address with our novel architecture: strength of the correlation is between cardiac features and PSG sleep stages it is not known a priori.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current state-of-the-art results extract dozens, if not hundreds, of expert-informed engineered features from physiological signals such as ECG/PPG and then use these as inputs to complex machine learning models to predict sleep stages [19][20][21][22] . The models either use features of neighboring time epochs explicitly to predict the stage for each time epoch 19 or use implicitly temporal models such as recurrent neural networks (RNNs) 20 . Such models have two important drawbacks that we address with our novel architecture: strength of the correlation is between cardiac features and PSG sleep stages it is not known a priori.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the four-stage sleep stages, light sleep (N1 and N2) is classified into one category. The recognition accuracy was 89% for four-stage cases and 78% for five-stage cases, higher than conventional studies with 69% [ 27 ] and 67% accuracy [ 28 , 29 , 30 ]. This also shows that our HRV estimation algorithm is sufficient for sleep stage classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This leads to the development of automatic sleep stage classification. Unfortunately, conventional algorithms utilizing heart rate features did not have a high accuracy for five-stage sleep stage classification [ 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Some studies tried combine sleep stages to simplify the problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, different modalities and the information they collect may be highly complementary and, in practice, aggregating sleep data from various sources may make models more robust and tolerant both to noise and missing data. Such complementary fusion protocols have been shown to significantly improve the classification performance of sleep stages 79,80 .…”
Section: Sleep Monitoring Outside the Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%