2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleeping arrangements under long-lasting impregnated mosquito nets: differences during low and high malaria transmission seasons

Abstract: Sleeping arrangements under long-lasting impregnated nets (LLIN) were recorded in 2467 households during the low malaria transmission season (May-June 2007) and the same families were followed up during the high malaria transmission season (December 2007-January 2008) in two malaria-endemic areas of Sri Lanka. Approximately 800 households each from the three main ethnic groups were studied. The number of families lost to follow-up was 68. A significant increase was seen in the proportion of households using LL… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This prevents detailed analysis of the determinants of non-use among those with access which might inform BCC planning to improve targeting of messaging to these ‘hold outs’. However, analysis of use rates by age in households with enough nets compared to households without enough nets indicates that those most likely not to be using a net when nets are scarce are adolescents and the elderly [41], as adults and young children tend to be prioritized for net use [9], [14], [17], [20], [42][46]. Reported reasons for not using nets when one is available are well documented [21], [24], [47][49], and non-use is primarily due to lack of perceived mosquito density and hot nighttime temperatures [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This prevents detailed analysis of the determinants of non-use among those with access which might inform BCC planning to improve targeting of messaging to these ‘hold outs’. However, analysis of use rates by age in households with enough nets compared to households without enough nets indicates that those most likely not to be using a net when nets are scarce are adolescents and the elderly [41], as adults and young children tend to be prioritized for net use [9], [14], [17], [20], [42][46]. Reported reasons for not using nets when one is available are well documented [21], [24], [47][49], and non-use is primarily due to lack of perceived mosquito density and hot nighttime temperatures [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus considerably lower than 80% of the targeted coverage of the Roll Back Malaria [13]. Moreover, this is higher than ITNs use rate in other malaria endemic countries, such as Iran (18.0%), Southern Ethiopia 15.8% [14], [3] and much lower than Sri Lanka (90%) and India (79.2%) [15], [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall Knowledge about ITN was calculated by adding up the score for each other across all (11) questions and the total score was (15). Poor Knowledge with score of less than the mean (<8.2) and Good Knowledge with the score equal to mean (8.2) or above.…”
Section: Figure 2 Overall Score Of Mother's Knowledge Attitudes Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, after conducting IDIs with 19 adults in Zanzibar, Beer et al found that young children received priority for net use when households had insufficient nets to protect all members [23]. In their survey of ITN use in over 2,400 Sri Lankan households, Fernando et al found that 75% and 90% of children under five slept under a net during low and high malaria transmission season, respectively [24,25]. Baume and Marin’s five-country population-based review of net use found “women of reproductive age and children under five… were most likely to use the net; least likely were children of age five to 14 and adult males.” The authors concluded that net campaigns should focus more on year-round use than biological vulnerability [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%