2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05334-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleeve Gastrectomy Failure—Revision to Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass or Roux-n-Y Gastric Bypass: a Multicenter Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, any procedure a failed SG is converted to must have good potential to cause additional weight loss. For example, Rayman S. et al compared a revision from SG to OAGB and RYGB in 119 and 144 patients, respectively, and found better weight loss but also higher rates of postoperative GERD in the OAGB group [ 18 ]. A study by Bashah M. et al comparing SADI-S to OAGB as revisional procedures after SG for weight recidivism found better weight loss after SADI-S compared to OAGB and also better results in terms of GERD symptoms [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, any procedure a failed SG is converted to must have good potential to cause additional weight loss. For example, Rayman S. et al compared a revision from SG to OAGB and RYGB in 119 and 144 patients, respectively, and found better weight loss but also higher rates of postoperative GERD in the OAGB group [ 18 ]. A study by Bashah M. et al comparing SADI-S to OAGB as revisional procedures after SG for weight recidivism found better weight loss after SADI-S compared to OAGB and also better results in terms of GERD symptoms [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement or remission of AMP is one of the most important results of any bariatric/metabolic procedure as well as for the patients’ individual life expectancies. In a study by Rayman S. et al comparing OAGB to RYGB as revisional procedures after SG, both groups showed an improvement of AMP; however, there was no significant difference between both operations [ 18 ]. The current study found good additional remission rates after the conversion in all categories of AMP in both revisional procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent study, the interval between SG and conversional OAGB was 4.1 ± 1.8 years. Rayman et al reported a mean interval of 5.6 years between two bariatric surgical procedures 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have shown controversial outcomes for related variables with different SG conversion procedures. There are limited published study about conversional OAGB following failed SG and most of them has reported the short to mid-term outcomes 9 11 that should be assess in long term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was also the case with SG [27]. Because of the adverse effects of both procedures on patients with reflux, many studies have suggested switching from SG and OAGB to other surgical procedures, such as RYGB [28].…”
Section: Remission On Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (Gerd)mentioning
confidence: 97%