Among patients with Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), the ability to identify patients at risk for deterioration during their hospital stay is essential for effective patient allocation and management. To predict patient risk for critical COVID-19 based on status at admission using machine-learning models. Retrospective study based on a database of tertiary medical center with designated departments for patients with COVID-19. Patients with severe COVID-19 at admission, based on low oxygen saturation, low partial arterial oxygen pressure, were excluded. The primary outcome was risk for critical disease, defined as mechanical ventilation, multi-organ failure, admission to the ICU, and/or death. Three different machine-learning models were used to predict patient deterioration and compared to currently suggested predictors and to the APACHEII risk-prediction score. Among 6995 patients evaluated, 162 were hospitalized with non-severe COVID-19, of them, 25 (15.4%) patients deteriorated to critical COVID-19. Machine-learning models outperformed the all other parameters, including the APACHE II score (ROC AUC of 0.92 vs. 0.79, respectively), reaching 88.0% sensitivity, 92.7% specificity and 92.0% accuracy in predicting critical COVID-19. The most contributory variables to the models were APACHE II score, white blood cell count, time from symptoms to admission, oxygen saturation and blood lymphocytes count. Machine-learning models demonstrated high efficacy in predicting critical COVID-19 compared to the most efficacious tools available. Hence, artificial intelligence may be applied for accurate risk prediction of patients with COVID-19, to optimize patients triage and in-hospital allocation, better prioritization of medical resources and improved overall management of the COVID-19 pandemic.

In the present study, we examined how real-world objects are represented in long-term memory. Two contrasting views exist with regard to this question: one argues that real-world objects are represented as a set of independent features, and the other argues that they form bound integrate representations. In 5 experiments, we tested the different predictions of each view, namely whether the different features of real-world items are remembered and forgotten independently from each other, in a feature-based manner, or conversely are stored and lost in an object-based manner, with all features depending upon each other. Across various stimuli, learning tasks (incidental or explicit), experimental setups (within- or between-subjects design), feature-dimensions, and encoding times, we consistently found that information is forgotten in an object-based manner. When an object ceases to be fully remembered, all of its features are lost, instead of only some of the object’s features being lost whereas other features are still remembered. Furthermore, we found support for a strong form of dependency among the different features, namely a hierarchical structure. We conclude that visual long-term memory is object-based, challenging previous findings.

No abstract

Molecular probes for cellular proto-oncogenes have recently been extensively used in order to search for functional and structural alterations in tumor tissues. Variable, and sometimes contradictory, results have been obtained regarding the frequency and clinical significance of amplification of the c-myc and c-erbB-2 proto-oncogenes in different series of human solid tumors. We addressed this question by performing Southern blotting analysis on 131 primary adult solid tumors of various tissues and 5 metastases of unknown origin, using molecular probes for both genes. Amplification of c-myc was found in 5 of the primary tumors, and amplification of c-erbB-2 in 5 others. In 2 tumors of the latter group, the c-erbB-2 gene was also rearranged. The distribution of these 10 tumors with regard to clinical stage and course of the disease did not point to an association between the amplification events and specific stage or prognosis. We concluded that, in this series, the amplification of both proto-oncogenes was occasional and was not a prognostic marker.