2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2022.204375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sliding wear behavior of a sustainable Fe-based coating and its damage mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16. All scars are elliptical-shaped rather than circular since wear debris built up around the area where the wear track and surface of the ball in contact, thereby, debris subsequential re-adhered on the ball along the sliding direction during wear [37,38]. As expected, the width of wear scars notably decreased with rising processing temperatures of SPS parts from 500 • C to 580 • C, due to the surface hardness improvement of these composite materials (Fig.…”
Section: Tribological Analysismentioning
confidence: 55%
“…16. All scars are elliptical-shaped rather than circular since wear debris built up around the area where the wear track and surface of the ball in contact, thereby, debris subsequential re-adhered on the ball along the sliding direction during wear [37,38]. As expected, the width of wear scars notably decreased with rising processing temperatures of SPS parts from 500 • C to 580 • C, due to the surface hardness improvement of these composite materials (Fig.…”
Section: Tribological Analysismentioning
confidence: 55%
“…High wear with elliptical-shaped scars was seen on counterbody chrome steel balls at 100 N for DI samples at 0.39 m/s speed; and at 0.79 m/s for ADI samples. At high loads, the accumulation of a large amount of debris takes place at the edges of wear tracks on the sample surface, leading to an increase in the non-planar contact area extending the arc along the circular scars, resulting in the formation of the elliptical scars on counterbody as explained by Kucharski et al and S. Mahade et al [19,38].
Figure 11 Counterbody (chrome steel) wear scar for (a) DI – 0.39 m/s, (b) ADI – 0.39 m/s, (c) ADI – 0.59 m/s and (d) ADI – 0.79 m/s under 100 N load.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, one of the most effective strategies to reduce wear is surface engineering, which consists of a series of physical and/or chemical modification processes at the surface and subsurface and does not change the intrinsic property and structure of base materials [3]. In the current studies, the main means by which scientists perform surface strengthening is the preparation of a wear-resistant coating on the metal surface, such as carburizing and cladding fabricated by additive manufacturing [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Cladding is a technique that uses one or more layers of coatings to the materials surface to achieve the desired properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%