2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.101.258301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slip and Flow of Hard-Sphere Colloidal Glasses

Abstract: We study the flow of concentrated hard-sphere colloidal suspensions along smooth, nonstick walls using cone-plate rheometry and simultaneous confocal microscopy. In the glass regime, the global flow shows a transition from Herschel-Bulkley behavior at large shear rate to a characteristic Bingham slip response at small rates, absent for ergodic colloidal fluids. Imaging reveals both the "solid" microstructure during full slip and the local nature of the "slip to shear" transition. Both the local and global flow… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
102
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
12
102
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A quantitative description of the motion of a sediment at a wall is quite difficult [71][72][73][74][75][76], and there are still many open questions. The following problems may be of relevance, but are beyond the scope of the present investigation: resuspension of particles [77,78] and related processes [79]; shear-induced migration of particles in concentrated suspensions [73][74][75]; not a sharp interface [80] and shear-induced corrugation of interfaces [81]; wall slip (depending on surface properties and particle material) [82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89]; stick-slip events [90]. For the present investigation, it is only of importance how the motion of the sediment affects the bulk flow, as this is what controls the settling time and the concentration in the suspension during the settling process.…”
Section: Iib: Sediment Moves Along the Wallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quantitative description of the motion of a sediment at a wall is quite difficult [71][72][73][74][75][76], and there are still many open questions. The following problems may be of relevance, but are beyond the scope of the present investigation: resuspension of particles [77,78] and related processes [79]; shear-induced migration of particles in concentrated suspensions [73][74][75]; not a sharp interface [80] and shear-induced corrugation of interfaces [81]; wall slip (depending on surface properties and particle material) [82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89]; stick-slip events [90]. For the present investigation, it is only of importance how the motion of the sediment affects the bulk flow, as this is what controls the settling time and the concentration in the suspension during the settling process.…”
Section: Iib: Sediment Moves Along the Wallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results also show that a size polydispersity of up to 5% does not increase the jamming density significantly from the monodisperse case. A much larger dependence on the polydispersity is often used in the experiments [10] based on the results of Ref. [12], casting doubts on the precise values for the volume fractions determined in experiments via this route.…”
Section: Fig 1: A) Pressure βP σmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we give accurate data for the jamming density φ J as a function of compression rate and size polydispersity, which is important for experiments on colloidal systems. The packing fraction of a polydisperse colloidal system is often determined by setting the packing fraction of a centrifuged sediment [10] equal to the φ rcp obtained from simulations [11,12]. However, these simulation results are very inaccurate and do not take into account any compression rate dependence, casting doubts on the accuracy of the volume fractions determined in experiments via this route.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group of designs uses counter-rotating surfaces to drive torsional flows with circular streamlines. 25,30,32,[35][36][37][38] Often, one of these surfaces is fixed in the laboratory frame. Independently rotating both surfaces, while more difficult, allows the zero-velocity plane to be moved away from the sample boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternate approach for torsional flows requires mounting a commercial rheometer on a confocal microscope. 25,[36][37][38] To achieve a uniform shear rate, commercial rheometers use a cone and plate geometry in which the sample thickness increases linearly with distance from the rotation axis. Measurements of confined suspensions, however, require a parallel plate geometry in which the sample thickness is uniform but the shear rate is not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%