2010
DOI: 10.1038/ngeo739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slip-rate variability and distributed deformation in the Marmara Sea fault system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
121
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
121
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is significantly less than longterm slip rates predicted for the NAF in this area [Flerit et al, 2003;Reilinger et al, 2006;Hergert and Heidbach, 2010] or from distant on-land GPS data [Ergintav et al, 2014]. If this slip deficit corresponds to a steady state behavior of the fault, it implies that the NAF is currently accumulating stress at the surface.…”
Section: 1002/2016gl069600mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is significantly less than longterm slip rates predicted for the NAF in this area [Flerit et al, 2003;Reilinger et al, 2006;Hergert and Heidbach, 2010] or from distant on-land GPS data [Ergintav et al, 2014]. If this slip deficit corresponds to a steady state behavior of the fault, it implies that the NAF is currently accumulating stress at the surface.…”
Section: 1002/2016gl069600mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The probability of rupture of NAF segments in the central part of the Marmara Sea is considered to be significant [Murru et al, 2016;Aochi and Ulrich, 2015;Parsons, 2004], and Schmittbuhl et al [2015] recently interpreted the low level of present-day seismicity along the ISS as the signature of a locked behavior. Although Bohnhoff et al [2016] suggest that the maximum expected earthquake in the Istanbul area would probably not exceed a magnitude 7.5, geomechanical models generally predict high strain accumulation along the ISS, sufficient to produce a magnitude 7+ event [Hergert and Heidbach, 2010;Pondard et al, 2007;Armijo et al, 2005;. Conversely, Ergintav et al [2014] proposed that the ISS is aseismically creeping with strain accumulation less than 2 mm/yr, based on GPS data from distant and sparsely distributed land stations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, either creep or a slip deficit should have been accumulating on this segment in that period. If it was unlocked, numerical models suggest its creep rate would be on the order of 12.8-17.8 mm a À 1 -a readily observable amount if appropriate GPS stations were available 19 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%