2017
DOI: 10.1002/2016jf003970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slope, grain size, and roughness controls on dry sediment transport and storage on steep hillslopes

Abstract: Existing hillslope sediment transport models developed for low‐relief, soil‐mantled landscapes are poorly suited to explain the coupling between steep rocky hillslopes and headwater channels. Here we address this knowledge gap using a series of field and numerical experiments to inform a particle‐based model of sediment transport by dry ravel—a mechanism of granular transport characteristic of steep hillslopes. We find that particle travel distance increases as a function of the ratio of particle diameter to f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
94
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(179 reference statements)
8
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The K s and h f values within the model domain were assigned on a cell‐by‐cell basis by randomly selecting values from a distribution fit to these 89 measured values by empirical cumulative distribution function. We further assumed, based on field observations of exposed bedrock in steeper portions of the study area, that locations with a slope over 45° were not soil‐mantled (DiBiase et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The K s and h f values within the model domain were assigned on a cell‐by‐cell basis by randomly selecting values from a distribution fit to these 89 measured values by empirical cumulative distribution function. We further assumed, based on field observations of exposed bedrock in steeper portions of the study area, that locations with a slope over 45° were not soil‐mantled (DiBiase et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixture is deposited when flow energy decreases in the downslope area. Third, the microcollapse of soil on unstable slopes and subsequent mass movement can bury litter at the bottom of rills (DiBiase, Lamb, Ganti, & Booth, ). Fourth, the uprooting in many forest ecosystems overturns the topsoil and litter layer, therefore causing soil–litter mixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The denominator represents the maximum rate of regolith removal by disturbance: It is the rate one would obtain if each disturbance triggers a ravel event that transports the disturbed material to the base of the slope. In other words, Ev=1 can be thought of as representing “perfect” nonlocal transport (e.g., DiBiase et al, ; Doane et al, ; Tucker & Bradley, ). Cases with Ev<1 arise either when some displaced regolith remains on the slope (indicating local, diffusive‐like transport) or when the regolith cover is incomplete.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%