2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow down, you’re going too fast: Matching curricula to student skill levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
60
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The insights from this paper are relevant for various strands of the wider literature. In light of the large debate about whether the worldwide increase in schooling is leading to measurable and sustained gains in learning (Pritchett and Beatty, 2015), having widely comparable measures of cognitive abilities, that can be measured for adults, outside of the classroom, and in a variety of settings, is arguably key. Certain large data collection efforts covering wide and heterogeneous populations, such as the Young Lives Surveys or the World Bank STEPS surveys (Pierre et al, 2014), are now including measures for noncognitive abilities and personality traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The insights from this paper are relevant for various strands of the wider literature. In light of the large debate about whether the worldwide increase in schooling is leading to measurable and sustained gains in learning (Pritchett and Beatty, 2015), having widely comparable measures of cognitive abilities, that can be measured for adults, outside of the classroom, and in a variety of settings, is arguably key. Certain large data collection efforts covering wide and heterogeneous populations, such as the Young Lives Surveys or the World Bank STEPS surveys (Pierre et al, 2014), are now including measures for noncognitive abilities and personality traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are cases of non‐existent schools and ‘ghost’ students ( The Economist, ). Moreover, the pace and rigidity of the curriculum may also be important contributory factors for the low level of learning in countries like Afghanistan (Pritchett & Beatty, ).…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor learning levels are apparent from the very first years of school: for example, in third grade 58% of children are still unable to read a Grade 1 level text (ASER Centre 2017).Keeping up with the curriculum right from the start is important: only around one in 10 children who lack basic literacy or numeracy skills are able to acquire them after an additional year of schooling (Bhattacharjea, Banerji, and Wadhwa 2011;Educational Initiatives 2010;Pritchett and Beatty 2015), and the gap between curriculum expectations and children's abilities only widens over time. The importance of the early years is further corroborated by the fact that dropout rates in India have been higher in Grades 1 and 2 than in later primary school grades (Mehta 2007;Reddy and Sinha 2010), indicating the precariousness of the transition from home/preschool to Grades 1 and 2.…”
Section: Prior Evidence On Early Childhood Education In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%