Slow infrastructures in times of crisis: unworking speed and convenience

Abstract

The (post)colonial logics of speed and convenience are manifest in many of today's infrastructural projects, creating what we consider to be 'fast infrastructures'. These infrastructures create ease for some and harm for others while exacerbating social and environmental crises around the world. Addressing these crises requires, we argue, a slowing down. Enter the role of 'slow infrastructures'. In this paper, we highlight two forms of slow infrastructure that provide possibilities for rearranging our infrastructural orientations: composting and rainwater harvesting. Drawing on fieldwork conducted throughout 2018 and 2019 in Kochi, Kerala, this research asserts that in order to do infrastructure differently, an unworking of convenience and speed is required. This unworking can be achieved through an attunement to multi-species and more-than-human relations, matched with a distributed ethic of maintenance and care. Our ethnographic examples, one from a hospital and another from a hotel, suggest that slow infrastructures can meaningfully offset the threat of disfunction and 'urban failure' that confronts cities increasingly marked by turbulence and uncertainty. While these examples draw from the tropics of urban South India, they offer lessons helpful to unworking the harm caused by fast infrastructures in other parts of the globe.

Towards a care perspective on waste: A new direction in discard studies

“…The ethics of care is inclusive rather than exclusive, acting as a gathering force that draws people to caring activities (Puig De la Bellacasa, 2011). It compels scholars to cultivate attentiveness so that they may take time to engage with differences and otherness in ways that do not cause exclusion and domination (Barlow and Drew, 2021). Commenting on a staged dialogue in which Bruno Latour imagines himself talking to an environmentalist angry about the widespread use of sport utility vehicles (SUVs), Puig de la Bellacasa (2011: 90) notes that criticising the use of SUVs is unproductive, since this cuts off dialogue with those with whom we disagree.…”

Optimising for equity: Sensor coverage, networks and the responsive city

“…Sensor technologies can underpin, on the one hand, a growing "surveillance economy" that exploits personal data to generate pro t (Zuboff 2015), and on the other, discriminatory policing practices informed by Big Data (Furguson 2019). As such, the aims of speed and convenience that typify today's "fast infrastructures" create ease for some and harm for others, exacerbating social and environmental crises around the world (Barlow and Drew 2020). Understandably, surveillanceorientated sensor technologies that collect data about people have attracted considerable critique (Kitchin et al 2015;Kitchin 2019;Crawford and Schultz 2014;Barocas and Nissenbaum 2014;Sadowski and Pasquale 2015).…”