2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.inoche.2016.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow magnetic relaxation in a two-dimensional dysprosium(III) coordination polymer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SMM and slow magnetic relaxations are the common feature in Dy­(III) MOFs. Interestingly, a Gd­(III) MOF is reported to exhibit magnetocaloric effect, whereas Er­(III) and Gd­(III) 2D MOFs display antiferromagnetic interactions. ,, A number of heterobimetallic MOFs containing Cu­(II) and lanthanide­(III) have been investigated for magnetic properties such as SMM, , ferromagnetic behavior below 50 K, and spin glass like unusual field dependent magnetic relaxation …”
Section: Properties and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SMM and slow magnetic relaxations are the common feature in Dy­(III) MOFs. Interestingly, a Gd­(III) MOF is reported to exhibit magnetocaloric effect, whereas Er­(III) and Gd­(III) 2D MOFs display antiferromagnetic interactions. ,, A number of heterobimetallic MOFs containing Cu­(II) and lanthanide­(III) have been investigated for magnetic properties such as SMM, , ferromagnetic behavior below 50 K, and spin glass like unusual field dependent magnetic relaxation …”
Section: Properties and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And may be for the same reason the χ M values are quite smaller as compared to χ M value in the AC susceptibility plots (Figure 5a,b). As χ M " versus T plots do not show any peak maxima above 2 K, so the τ 0 the energy barrier (U eff ) cannot be determined by using the Arrhenius method [62,63]. So by using another method, which assumes that there is only one single relaxation process with one energy barrier and one time constant that can be extracted by the following equation (Debye Model) [ The best fit of Debye equation yielded an energy barrier of 2.5 K ( Figure 6) and τ 0 is 6.6 × 10 −7 s. It is worth noting that these are only approximate values and therefore should be taken with caution [61].…”
Section: Dynamic Magnetic Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%