The
efficient operation of metal-ion batteries in harsh environments,
such as at temperatures below −20 °C or at high charge/discharge
rates required for EV applications, calls for a careful selection
of electrode materials. In this study, we report advantages associated
with the solid solution (de)intercalation over the two-phase (de)intercalation
pathway and identify the main sources of performance limitations originating
from the two mechanisms. To isolate the (de)intercalation pathway
as the main variable, we focused on two cathode materials for Na-ion
batteries: a recently developed KTiOPO4-type NaVPO4F and a well-studied Na3V2(PO4)2F3. These materials have the same elemental
composition, operate within the same potential range, and demonstrate
very close ionic diffusivities, yet follow different (de)intercalation
routes. To avoid any interpretation uncertainties, we obtained these
materials in the form of particles with merely identical morphology
and size. A detailed electrochemical study revealed a much lower capacity
and energy density retention for phase-transforming Na3V2(PO4)2F3 compared to
NaVPO4F, which exhibits a single-phase behavior over a
wide range of Na concentrations. The reasons for the inferior rate
capability and temperature tolerance for the phase-separating Na3V2(PO4)2F3 material
should be affiliated with slow phase boundary propagation. We hope
that the comprehensive information on limiting factors provided for
both mechanisms is useful for the further optimization of electrode
materials toward a new generation of high-power and low-temperature
metal-ion batteries.