2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2012.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow wave sleep during a daytime nap is necessary for protection from subsequent interference and long-term retention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
66
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
5
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3). This correlation of memory improvement with SWS echoes prior observations of the importance of this sleep stage to other forms of hippocampus-dependent memory consolidation (Plihal and Born 1997;Lau et al 2011;Alger et al 2012), which here appears to have been enhanced by feedback.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3). This correlation of memory improvement with SWS echoes prior observations of the importance of this sleep stage to other forms of hippocampus-dependent memory consolidation (Plihal and Born 1997;Lau et al 2011;Alger et al 2012), which here appears to have been enhanced by feedback.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The human brain is constantly bombarded with a barrage of stimuli, and must decipher which newly encoded information is important enough to consolidate into long-term memory. It is now clear that memory consolidation is facilitated by sleep (Plihal and Born 1997;Stickgold et al 2000;Mednick et al 2002;Walker et al 2002;Tucker et al 2006;Drosopoulos et al 2007;Ellenbogen et al 2007;Alger et al 2012). However, sleep may not benefit all memories equally-emerging evidence suggests that sleepdependent memory consolidation is influenced by a variety of factors including emotion (Payne et al 2008), expected future utility (Wilhelm et al 2011a), and reward (Fischer and Born 2009;Oudiette et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During slow wave sleep, thought to benefit hippocampal dependent declarative memory, reactivation of the face-object pairs may promote the beginning of the process of consolidation from short-term dependence on the hippocampus to eventual longterm neocortical storage (Buzsáki, 1989;Peigneux et al, 2004;Wilson & McNaughton, 1994). Although we did not find an explicit significant relationship between performance and SWS in this study, we cannot rule out that SWS is playing a role in the preservation of memory for the paired associates, as several studies find a general benefit of sleep for this type of memory using designs that indicate a role for NREM sleep (e.g., split night design with SWS-rich sleep, Plihal & Born, 1997;NREM only nap, Tucker et al, 2006; naps with and without SWS, Alger, Lau, & Fishbein, 2012). With regard to relational memory, Lau et al (2010), using a task similar to the current one, found a relationship between SWS and face-face memory formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Furthermore, whereas most studies have entailed the learning of a single novel task, real-world learning often involves the acquisition of a variety of skills or information that may interfere with other learning acquired throughout the day. A number of recent studies have explored the interaction between interference and sleep consolidation (e.g., Walker et al 2003;Ellenbogen et al 2006Ellenbogen et al , 2009Korman et al 2007;Drosopoulos et al 2007;Diekelmann et al 2011;Alger et al 2012;Sheth et al 2012). Remarkably, the memory benefit of sleep is often greater in conditions with interference compared to conditions that only learn a single task.…”
Section: A Behavioral Approach To Sleep-dependent Memory Consolidationmentioning
confidence: 99%