2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sludge profiling at varied organic loadings and performance evaluation of UASB reactor treating sewage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The UASB process was developed by Lettinga and coworkers in the late 1970s [6]. It is primarily used for the treatment of highly concentrated industrial wastewaters [7][8][9]; however, it can also be used for the treatment of low strength wastewater such as municipal wastewater with relatively lower contaminant strength [10][11][12][13][14]. As compared to aerobic technologies anaerobic treatment systems such as UASB are being encouraged because of several advantages, including plain design, uncomplicated construction and maintenance, small land requirement, low construction and operating cost, low excess sludge production, robustness in terms of COD removal efficiency, ability to cope with fluctuations in temperature, pH and influent concentration, quick biomass recovery after shutdown, and energy generation in the form of biogas or hydrogen [1,9,[15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: −1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The UASB process was developed by Lettinga and coworkers in the late 1970s [6]. It is primarily used for the treatment of highly concentrated industrial wastewaters [7][8][9]; however, it can also be used for the treatment of low strength wastewater such as municipal wastewater with relatively lower contaminant strength [10][11][12][13][14]. As compared to aerobic technologies anaerobic treatment systems such as UASB are being encouraged because of several advantages, including plain design, uncomplicated construction and maintenance, small land requirement, low construction and operating cost, low excess sludge production, robustness in terms of COD removal efficiency, ability to cope with fluctuations in temperature, pH and influent concentration, quick biomass recovery after shutdown, and energy generation in the form of biogas or hydrogen [1,9,[15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: −1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is particularly appealing in tropical countries where the comparatively high ambient temperature is nearly optimum for the mesophilic methanogenic bacteria [11,13]. Significant efforts were made in the past twenty years to ascertain the mass transfer and kinetic processes going on in the reactor.…”
Section: −1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the removal efficiency increased to the range of 79-81 and 77-83%, respectively at 25-30°C, 9 h HRT and 150 days of operation. Khan et al (2015) studied performance evaluation of UASB reactor treating domestic wastewater using 60 L pilot scale reactor. The treatment efficiencies were investigated at 8 h HRT and ambient temperature ranged from 8 to 40°C.…”
Section: Domestic Wastewater Treatment In Uasb Reactormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tartakovsky et al [6] investigated biomethane production using a microalgae biomass as the substrate in an up-flow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) and reported 80% methane at an HRT of 3.5 d. Lu et al [7] demonstrated that 60% methane can be generated within 6 h in a UASB treating starch wastewater. Khan et al [8] reported that a UASB treating sewage was able to produce 70% methane in 8 h. An investigation by Kongjan et al [9] showed that with an HRT of 36 h, a UASB treating frozen fishery wastewater was capable of producing 57-65% methane. Matsuura et al [10] observed 40-50% methane in a UASB at an HRT of 12.8 h. On the other hand, Jijai et al [11] reported that decrease in HRT would result in decreased COD removal and biogas generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%