2021
DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2021.1902528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Factors in Emerging Adults:Symptomatic and Neuropsychological Correlates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

12
28
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
12
28
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of the present study support prior work demonstrating the weak to null associations between CDS symptoms and objective cognitive performance among adults (Jarrett et al, 2017; Kamradt et al, 2018; Smith & Suhr, 2021). Some prior studies have demonstrated selective deficits in sustained attention (Jarrett et al, 2017), which were not observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Results of the present study support prior work demonstrating the weak to null associations between CDS symptoms and objective cognitive performance among adults (Jarrett et al, 2017; Kamradt et al, 2018; Smith & Suhr, 2021). Some prior studies have demonstrated selective deficits in sustained attention (Jarrett et al, 2017), which were not observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, this difference may also be explained by CDS symptom measurement. The majority of studies demonstrating similar results to the present study utilized the 9-item SCT/CDS scale from the BAARS-IV (Barkley, 2011; Jarrett et al, 2017; Kamradt et al, 2018; Smith & Suhr, 2021; Wood et al, 2017), which is validated for use among adults. Conversely, pediatric studies drew items from the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL-C; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001) to create a CDS composite with 4 to 12 items (Bauermeister et al, 2012; Creque & Willcutt, 2021; Wåhlstedt & Bohlin, 2010; Willcutt et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations