1981
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-198106000-00038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small Deep Infarcts Diagnosed on Computed Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this incidence is higher than in previous studies, which have estimated the incidence as roughly 30-33%, 8 …”
contrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Although this incidence is higher than in previous studies, which have estimated the incidence as roughly 30-33%, 8 …”
contrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Stroke subtypes were classified according to the TOAST as cardiac embolism, other or unknown cause of stroke. The subjects were divided into groups according to the size of infarction observed on CT (referent to Pullicino (13)): large infarction group (>10 cm 3 ), middle infarction group (4.1-10 cm 3 ) and small infarction group (! 4 cm 3 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of these studies, carotid artery disease was found to be significantly less frequent in patients with lacunar strokes compared with nonlacunar strokes. [31][32][33][34][35][36] The frequency of carotid disease in lacunar strokes has been considerably variable in different studies, ranging from 3% to 39%, [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] although it must be noted that the methodology used to both classify lacunar infarcts as well as to detect carotid disease also varied widely. A study of 726 patients with anterior circulation transient ischemic events or infarcts, excluding total anterior circulation infarcts, revealed a negative association of severe carotid stenosis with lacunar events.…”
Section: Carotid Artery Disease and Lacunar Infarctsmentioning
confidence: 99%