1991
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.11.12.6337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small differences in Drosophila tropomyosin expression have significant effects on muscle function.

Abstract: The effects of promoter deletions on Drosophila tropomyosin I (Tin) gene expression have been determined by measuring TmI RNA levels in transformed flies. Decreases (Fig. 1). IFM and TDT functions in transformants homozygous for each TmI transgene were determined (Fig. 1), and total TmI RNA expression was measured by primer extension analysis of adult RNA (Fig. 2). The results summarized in Table 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies on IFM mutants indicate that structural integrity of IFMs is highly dependent on interactions between thin and thick filaments, as well as the ratio of individual myofibrillar contractile components. Any change in gene dosage and corresponding protein stoichiometry in the thin filaments translates into defects in normal myofibrillar assembly leading to hypercontraction ( Tansey et al 1991 ; Nongthomba et al 2003 , 2007 ). This explains the myofibrillar defects that result from overexpression of TnT ( Marco-Ferreres et al 2005 ), Mhc ( Cripps et al 1994 ), and in most of the heterozygotes carrying mutations in genes encoding structural proteins ( Prado et al 1995 ; Gajewski and Saul 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on IFM mutants indicate that structural integrity of IFMs is highly dependent on interactions between thin and thick filaments, as well as the ratio of individual myofibrillar contractile components. Any change in gene dosage and corresponding protein stoichiometry in the thin filaments translates into defects in normal myofibrillar assembly leading to hypercontraction ( Tansey et al 1991 ; Nongthomba et al 2003 , 2007 ). This explains the myofibrillar defects that result from overexpression of TnT ( Marco-Ferreres et al 2005 ), Mhc ( Cripps et al 1994 ), and in most of the heterozygotes carrying mutations in genes encoding structural proteins ( Prado et al 1995 ; Gajewski and Saul 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is similar to the phenotype seen in flies haploinsuflicient for another thick filament structural protein, myosin light chain 2 (Warmke et al, 1988(Warmke et al, , 1992. The "cracking" phenotype seen in these mutants depends upon the presence of excess amounts of thin filament proteins, since Beall et al (1989) showed that haploinsufliciency for both myosin and actin results in relatively normal myofibrils: This cracking effect contrasts with the phenotype of flies haploinsuflicient for thin filament proteins, including actin (BeaU et al, 1989) and tropomyosin (Karlik and Fyrberg, 1985;Tansey et al, 1991), where the centers of the myofibrils appear normal and are not cracked, but the peripheries show scattered and misaligned thick filaments. It appears tO be the relative levels of thin filament to thick filament proteins that are important in determining whether the myofibril becomes cracked or simply disrupted at the edge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deletion of the only known cytoskeletal Tm genes in Drosophila melanogaster (TmI and TmII) leads to altered head morphogenesis, shorter sarcomeres, and disruptions to thick and thin filament packing (23,38,40). However, a rescue experiment with a nonflight muscle Tm isoform showed that the phenotype of the mutant indirect flight muscle Tm could be restored (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%