2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small forest losses degrade stream macroinvertebrate assemblages in the eastern Brazilian Amazon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
1
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
18
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In other studies, macroinvertebrate abundance was predominantly affected by local land use (Allan, 2004) and only 1.4%-6.5% reduction in riparian vegetation coverage was associated with the loss of sensitive macroinvertebrate species (Brito et al, 2020;Dala-Corte et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other studies, macroinvertebrate abundance was predominantly affected by local land use (Allan, 2004) and only 1.4%-6.5% reduction in riparian vegetation coverage was associated with the loss of sensitive macroinvertebrate species (Brito et al, 2020;Dala-Corte et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…High IDI values were also associated with an increased risk of biological changes related to human activities in other Cerrado streams (Ligeiro et al, 2013). Bed instability and excess fine sediments are associated with disturbances in the catchment and riparian zone, thereby reducing MMI scores and sensitive taxa (Brito et al, 2020;Dala-Corte et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, Federal Law 12651/2012 states that, for streams up to 10m wide, at least 30m of riparian vegetation width must be protected in all biomes. In spite of this, there is little scientific support that this minimum riparian zone width is adequate to maintain the biodiversity of the associated stream ecosystems (Brito et al, 2020;Leal et al, 2018;Luke et al, 2019;Metzger, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Oregon (USA), water body monitoring and assessment data from eight different institutions were easily synthesized because all used a standard survey design, standard methods, and the same environmental and biological indicators [ 55 ]. Multiple Brazilian universities employed the same NARS survey design, standard sampling methods, and indicators for regionally assessing Atlantic Forest [ 39 ] Cerrado [ 8 , 68 ] and Amazônia [ 3 , 47 ] streams. Jimenez-Valencia et al [ 39 ] determined that 62% of basin stream length was in poor condition based on macroinvertebrate assemblage condition,the risk of poor condition was four-fold greater in catchments with degraded forest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%