2015
DOI: 10.1656/045.022.0318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small-Mammal Consumption of Hypogeous Fungi in the Central Adirondacks of New York

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although faeces collected from the traps may have acquired spores from the environment, Kohl et al (2015) found no significant difference in the microbiome between Desert Woodrat (Neotoma lepida) faeces collected aseptically and faeces collected from live traps. Macrofungi and mycorrhizal fungi are part of the omnivorous diet of P. maniculatus, and viable spores of these fungi are frequently detected in their faeces and stomach contents outside caves (Maser and Maser 1987;Pyare and Longland, 2001;Frank et al 2006;D'Avla et al 2007;Meyer et al 2015). It is thought that P. maniculatus and other rodents play a role in dispersing fungal spores across the landscape, which is of particular importance with regard to mycorrhizal inoculum (Maser and Maser 1987;Pyare and Longland 2001;Frank et al 2006;D'Avla et al 2007;Meyer et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although faeces collected from the traps may have acquired spores from the environment, Kohl et al (2015) found no significant difference in the microbiome between Desert Woodrat (Neotoma lepida) faeces collected aseptically and faeces collected from live traps. Macrofungi and mycorrhizal fungi are part of the omnivorous diet of P. maniculatus, and viable spores of these fungi are frequently detected in their faeces and stomach contents outside caves (Maser and Maser 1987;Pyare and Longland, 2001;Frank et al 2006;D'Avla et al 2007;Meyer et al 2015). It is thought that P. maniculatus and other rodents play a role in dispersing fungal spores across the landscape, which is of particular importance with regard to mycorrhizal inoculum (Maser and Maser 1987;Pyare and Longland 2001;Frank et al 2006;D'Avla et al 2007;Meyer et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macrofungi and mycorrhizal fungi are part of the omnivorous diet of P. maniculatus, and viable spores of these fungi are frequently detected in their faeces and stomach contents outside caves (Maser and Maser 1987;Pyare and Longland, 2001;Frank et al 2006;D'Avla et al 2007;Meyer et al 2015). It is thought that P. maniculatus and other rodents play a role in dispersing fungal spores across the landscape, which is of particular importance with regard to mycorrhizal inoculum (Maser and Maser 1987;Pyare and Longland 2001;Frank et al 2006;D'Avla et al 2007;Meyer et al 2015). However, mice are unlikely to transport fungal spores great distances internally, as Cork and Kenagy (1989) found that the mean retention time of Elaphomyces granulatus spores was 12.0 h (standard error 2.4) in P. maniculatus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As hypogeous fungi, the Hymenogaster species symbiotically form ectomycorrhizae with various tree species, helping plants uptake nutrients and rebuild the ecosystems [6,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. They also serve as food sources for small mammals in the forest, such as Clethrionomys gapperi, Napaeozapus insignis, Sus scrofa, Tamias striatus, Tamiasciurus hudsonicus, and Zapus hudsonius, as well as some birds and invertebrates, and in this way, these small animals can also help spread Hymenogaster spores [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%