2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bdq.2017.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small sample sizes in high-throughput miRNA screens: A common pitfall for the identification of miRNA biomarkers

Abstract: Since the discovery of microRNAs (miRNAs), circulating miRNAs have been proposed as biomarkers for disease. Consequently, many groups have tried to identify circulating miRNA biomarkers for various types of diseases including cardiovascular disease and cancer. However, the replicability of these experiments has been disappointingly low. In order to identify circulating miRNA candidate biomarkers, in general, first an unbiased high-throughput screen is performed in which a large number of miRNAs is detected and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We aimed to include a small sample size, 12 horses in total, three of each subgroup, which is commonly used in pilot studies because the method of high‐throughput sequencing is very expensive. This approach will allow us to calculate the necessary sample size for validation of the results in larger study cohorts . Horses were only included in the study on histological confirmation of tumour type.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We aimed to include a small sample size, 12 horses in total, three of each subgroup, which is commonly used in pilot studies because the method of high‐throughput sequencing is very expensive. This approach will allow us to calculate the necessary sample size for validation of the results in larger study cohorts . Horses were only included in the study on histological confirmation of tumour type.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach will allow us to calculate the necessary sample size for validation of the results in larger study cohorts. 25 Horses were only included in the study on histological confirmation of tumour type. The lesions of horses with ES were scored according to a previously established score for clinical disease that ranged from 3 to 19.…”
Section: Study Cohort and Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the high costs associated with next generation sequencing, a low number of study subjects (5 horses per group) were selected for this exploratory cohort study. Because no general consensus currently exists on what the sample size should be for miRNA biomarker studies, a previously recommended approach was used …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, circulating levels of hsa-miR-145 were lower in women with endometriosis compared to controls [31] whereas hsa-miR-145 levels did not differ [47] or were higher in women with endometriosis compared to the control groups [50]. We postulate that divergent results may be the consequence of different screening platforms and technologies used to identify candidate miRNA markers of disease [57][58][59] and control group characteristics. Moreover, we suggest that different reference material used to quantify circulating miRNA levels are an additional source of variation.…”
Section: Candidate Clinical Markers Of Endometriosismentioning
confidence: 99%