2001
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.d01-206.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small-scale patterns of species richness in Swedish semi-natural grasslands: the effects of community species pools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recruitment in this system is probably explained by stochasticity in recruitment success, as suggested for other grassland ecosystems (van der Maarel & Sykes 1993; Franzen & Eriksson 2001), where an occasional recruitment event can sustain population size over long periods (Warner & Chesson 1985). Accordingly, in the longleaf pine‐wiregrass ecosystem, site moisture conditions suitable for establishment (as opposed to space limitations) and the available seed pools are feasible factors limiting recruitment (Zobel 1992, 1997; Franzen & Eriksson 2001). Seed pool composition, in turn, is controlled by dispersal distances, seed production rates, fragmentation of the surrounding landscape, and seed longevity in the soil (Gross 1987; Eriksson & Ehrlen 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recruitment in this system is probably explained by stochasticity in recruitment success, as suggested for other grassland ecosystems (van der Maarel & Sykes 1993; Franzen & Eriksson 2001), where an occasional recruitment event can sustain population size over long periods (Warner & Chesson 1985). Accordingly, in the longleaf pine‐wiregrass ecosystem, site moisture conditions suitable for establishment (as opposed to space limitations) and the available seed pools are feasible factors limiting recruitment (Zobel 1992, 1997; Franzen & Eriksson 2001). Seed pool composition, in turn, is controlled by dispersal distances, seed production rates, fragmentation of the surrounding landscape, and seed longevity in the soil (Gross 1987; Eriksson & Ehrlen 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In relatively undisturbed ground‐cover sites subjected to frequent fire, soil moisture appears to be an important factor regulating the number of species present across the xeric‐mesic landscape. In contrast to many temperate grasslands (Abrams & Hulbert 1987; Gibson & Hulbert 1987; Franzen & Eriksson 2001), there is little/no evidence for competitive exclusion as a factor regulating species richness in the ground cover of longleaf pine‐wiregrass forests (Kirkman et al . 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our protocol was different, since the botanical survey was conducted at the grassland scale by a random walk strategy, and only one biodiversity index was computed from it. Yet, grasslands are characterized by patterns of small scale species composition and spatial distribution [47][48][49]. Hence, this estimation of the biodiversity at the grassland level may be difficult to relate to remote sensing data and might have limited our analysis.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the paired spectral and vegetation plots belong to the same grassland age categories, and there is no variation in grazing intensity between the spectral plot and its corresponding vegetation plot, we cannot exclude the possibility that the relationship may have been influenced by environmental conditions in the 2 m zone surrounding the vegetation plots. However, species diversity levels at different spatial scales often show a positive relationship within semi-natural grasslands (e.g., [66,67]). For example, within Swedish semi-natural grassland the species diversity at the 1 dmˆ1 dm scale was explained by the size of the species pool at the 2 mˆ2 m scale [66].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, species diversity levels at different spatial scales often show a positive relationship within semi-natural grasslands (e.g., [66,67]). For example, within Swedish semi-natural grassland the species diversity at the 1 dmˆ1 dm scale was explained by the size of the species pool at the 2 mˆ2 m scale [66].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%