2021 5th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/iciccs51141.2021.9432074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smart City Air Quality Prediction using Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zamani Joharestani et al, found that longitude, latitude and elevation were some of the most important variables for their RF model to predict PM 2.5 concentrations in Teheran and demonstrated that they could even replace other correlated variables [40]. Furthermore, Stafoggia et al as well as Murugan and Palanichamy showed that spatial coordinates have high importance for the accuracy of their RF PM 2.5 prediction models for Italy and Malaysia, respectively [30,44]. Hu et al, trained a PM 2.5 prediction model for the US and found that land use and population density had a significant influence on model accuracy [41].…”
Section: Feature Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zamani Joharestani et al, found that longitude, latitude and elevation were some of the most important variables for their RF model to predict PM 2.5 concentrations in Teheran and demonstrated that they could even replace other correlated variables [40]. Furthermore, Stafoggia et al as well as Murugan and Palanichamy showed that spatial coordinates have high importance for the accuracy of their RF PM 2.5 prediction models for Italy and Malaysia, respectively [30,44]. Hu et al, trained a PM 2.5 prediction model for the US and found that land use and population density had a significant influence on model accuracy [41].…”
Section: Feature Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML methods have been proven to efficiently combine information on PM 2.5 , AOD and other spatialtemporal varying predictors. Several studies have compared the performance of different ML methods for PM 2.5 predictions, such as simple decision trees, random forests, support vector machines or Gradient Boosting, and a majority of them found random forest (RF) to perform the best [30][31][32][33][34][35]. The RF models allow for the consideration of numerous parameters for very accurate PM 2.5 predictions and provide importance measures to assess the influence of the respective parameters on the model's accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study is limited to regression techniques, although other machine learning algorithms also perform better at predicting air quality. The research in [37] addresses the before-mentioned limitation by comparing multi-layer convolution and random forest methods on a Malaysian air pollution dataset. The findings suggest that Random Forest outperformed MLP in forecasting the PM2.5 air pollution index in Malaysia's smart city.…”
Section: Smart Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ML part of this framework is formed by the gradient-boosting model, which has been trained with a total of 51,831 records of patients with and without COVID-19. This work [92] has the objective of predicting the concentration of polluted air in smart cities.…”
Section: ) Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%