Smart grid terminology development—crossing the boundaries of terminology standardization

Abstract

Background: Standardization is concerned with ongoing terminology standardization activities. Activities are rather complex in divergent topics and current themes of interest. The article is concerned with terminology standardization activities in Germany and international standardization activities for smart grids and smart-grid-related topics like smart metering systems, smart homes, and electromobility. Even though standardization topics are very clearly organized by standardization road maps, and responsibilities are distributed among working groups, there are still conceptual overlaps between activities of different groups that will result in inconsistencies and ambiguities in their respective glossaries. These glossaries, however, undergo only a limited process of synchronization during their development, especially on the level of single concepts and terms. The application of inconsistent and ambiguous terminology in standards may later on reduce their internal and external consistency, readability, and understandability. To create high-quality standards, conceptual consistency needs to be guaranteed. To do this, terminologies under development should be made more openly available to standardization working groups in the development phase (and not only after completion). Furthermore, additional synchronization tasks on the conceptual level are needed to generate consistent and clear conceptualizations of new technologies. Methods: A number of glossaries have been analyzed for overlaps as described by this article. Results: The article gives an overview of issues found in the respective glossaries, and the process can lead to proposals which may be put to vote among domain experts.

A new approach to semantic sustainability assessment: text mining via network analysis revealing transition patterns in German municipal climate action plans

“…However, such unified terminologies require ongoing harmonization processes. In the case of smart grids, this was pointed out, e.g., by Arndt et al [118]. The holistic perspective of this study might be a starting point for such harmonization process to establish the field of semantic sustainability assessment.…”

Status of Social Competencies of Power Engineers in the Context of Forming the Concept of an Intelligent Network or Smart Grid

“…Getting important opportunities for consumers means also a certain level of responsibility [3,4,5,6]. Therefore, it is obvious that power grids (power supply networks) become intelligent not so much due to the technical equipment, as due to a man and his willingness to organize his behavior accordingly (so that the society could only benefit from it).…”

Harbsafe-162. A Domain-Specific Data Set for the Intrinsic Evaluation of Semantic Representations for Terminological Data

“…Even standards bodies may produce terminologies that show ambiguity, synonymy, and even inconsistencies (cf. Arndt, Sheveleva, and Goeker 2015). The reality for requirements (1), (2), and (3), is thus better depicted by (1'), (2'), and (3').…”