2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2020.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smart wearable device accessories may interfere with implantable cardiac devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies with a limited number of CIED models have confirmed that the magnet-sensitive switches in CIEDs are susceptible to interference from consumer electronic devices with built-in magnets. [6][7][8]18 Neodymium magnets are used in standard mobile phone components such as camera auto-focus, speakers, and taptic or vibration units (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies with a limited number of CIED models have confirmed that the magnet-sensitive switches in CIEDs are susceptible to interference from consumer electronic devices with built-in magnets. [6][7][8]18 Neodymium magnets are used in standard mobile phone components such as camera auto-focus, speakers, and taptic or vibration units (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e monitoring analysis and service of heart rate, frequency, pressure, diving depth, and altitude indicators are realized. e mainstream product forms of smart wearable devices include wrist-supported watch, footsupported shoes, head-supported glass, and various nonmainstream products such as smart clothing, school bags, crutches, and accessories [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. e contribution for this work is as follows: (1) It identified the pain points in the youth basketball dribble training scene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After an investigation, it was revealed that this beeping was due to magnetic reversion mode being triggered by the Apple Watch wristband. The authors subsequently tested Fitbit and the Apple Watch magnetic wristbands and found that both were able to trigger magnetic reversion mode ex vivo on a Medtronic device at distance of 2.4 and 2.0 cm, respectively [35]. While the study by Lacour and Tzeis did not demonstrate any cases of magnet reversion mode being triggered by smartwatches, the study by Seidman et al demonstrates that the Apple Watch 6th generation has a strong enough static magnetic field to induce magnet reversion mode in CIEDs [30•].…”
Section: Magnetic Interference From Smartphone Accessoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%