Smartphone and Tablet Software Apps to Collect Data in Sport and Exercise Settings: Cross-sectional International Survey

Abstract

Background Advances in smartphone technology have facilitated an increase in the number of commercially available smartphone and tablet apps that enable the collection of physiological and biomechanical variables typically monitored in sport and exercise settings. Currently, it is not fully understood whether individuals collect data using mobile devices and tablets, independent of additional hardware, in their practice. Objective This study aims to explore the use of smartphone and tablet software apps to collect data by individuals working in various sport and exercise settings, such as sports coaching, strength and conditioning, and personal training. Methods A total of 335 practitioners completed an electronic questionnaire that surveyed their current training practices, with a focus on 2 areas: type of data collection and perceptions of reliability and validity regarding app use. An 18-item questionnaire, using a 5-point Likert scale, evaluated the perception of app use. Results A total of 204 respondents reported using apps to directly collect data, with most of them (196/335, 58.5%) collecting biomechanical data, and 41.2% (138/335) respondents reported using at least one evidence-based app. A binomial general linear model determined that evidence accessibility (β=.35, 95% CI 0.04-0.67; P=.03) was significantly related to evidence-based app use. Age (β=−.03, 95% CI −0.06 to 0.00; P=.03) had a significant negative effect on evidence-based app use. Conclusions This study demonstrates that practitioners show a greater preference for using smartphones and tablet devices to collect biomechanical data such as sprint velocity and jump performance variables. When it is easier to access information on the quality of apps, practitioners are more likely to use evidence-based apps. App developers should seek independent research to validate their apps. In addition, app developers should seek to provide clear signposting to the scientific support of their software in alternative ways.

Devices to measure calf raise test outcomes: A narrative review

“…The Calf Raise application (Hébert‐Losier & Balsalobre‐Fernández, 2020) hence provides a valid and reliable method for assessing the three main CRT outcomes, and an innovative clinical‐friendly low‐cost option to iOS users. Given that clinicians (Galetsi et al., 2022) and practitioners (Shaw et al., 2021) are increasingly using mobile applications and digital technologies, the computer‐vision‐based mobile application is an appealing and accessible solution for quantifying CRT outcomes in clinics, although it still requires access to an iOS device.…”

Use, and acceptability, of digital health technologies in musculoskeletal physical therapy: A survey of physical therapists and patients

“…To date, there has been a dearth of studies examining physical therapists' routine uses of digital health in clinical practice. However, recent research has examined technology use by other sports and exercise medicine professionals (Shaw et al., 2021). In contrast to our findings, the authors reported a much greater use of app‐based tablets and smartphones to collect client data among exercise science professionals and coaches ( n = 204/335%; 60.9% users).…”

The Impact of Parental Migration on Multidimensional Health of Children in Rural China: The Moderating Effect of Mobile Phone Addiction

“…However, exercise apps on mobile phones can be used to promote physical exercise among rural children. Relevant research shows that most college students use exercise apps every week, and athletics programs can improve motivation and desire to exercise [62]. Additionally, migrant parents provide their children with mobile phones to communicate with them, while left-behind children meet their inner needs and obtain satisfaction using mobile phones [63].…”