2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smear Layer Removal Using Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and Different Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been confirmed by previous research where PUI with both irrigants was very effective, with an average of 88% of the cleaned root canal walls [20]. Newer research underlines activating chelating irrigants (ultrasonically agitated) with PUI as very efficient [27,28]. The combination of these two irrigants produces optimal results with the appropriate duration of irrigation, as well as the amount of irrigants themselves [8,13,18,29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This has been confirmed by previous research where PUI with both irrigants was very effective, with an average of 88% of the cleaned root canal walls [20]. Newer research underlines activating chelating irrigants (ultrasonically agitated) with PUI as very efficient [27,28]. The combination of these two irrigants produces optimal results with the appropriate duration of irrigation, as well as the amount of irrigants themselves [8,13,18,29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In some instances, conventional syringe needle irrigation fails to reach the third apical intricacy of the root canal system, which warrants the use of irrigation activation to increase the flow and distribution. Activation of the irrigant causes acoustic streaming and cavitation, enabling the irrigant to reach the inaccessible areas of the canal [ 31 , 32 , 33 ]. All the included studies used S.E.M.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the NaOCl concentrations during final irrigation protocols were different among the studies (ranging from 1 to 2.5%), it is noteworthy to point out that the removal of AHTD does not seem to be a purely chemical phenomenon, but rather one with a strong physical component. 37,38 A previous systematic review that used SEM analysis 13 to evaluate the removal of debris with different activation techniques, demonstrated that PUI improved debris removal in the middle third only when compared with NAI. However, the conventional SEM is a non-trustworthy and non-reproducible method for evaluating AHTD removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%