2019
DOI: 10.1117/1.jei.28.3.033006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoke detection and trend prediction method based on Deeplabv3+ and generative adversarial network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also created synthetic smoke images instead of labeling the real smoke images manually for training and then tested the network on both synthetic and real videos. Cheng et al [ 68 ] proposed a smoke detection model using Deeplabv3+ and a generative adversarial network (GAN). The smoke pixels were first identified by fusing the result Deeplabv3+ and the heatmap of smoke based on HSV features.…”
Section: Early Fire Detection Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also created synthetic smoke images instead of labeling the real smoke images manually for training and then tested the network on both synthetic and real videos. Cheng et al [ 68 ] proposed a smoke detection model using Deeplabv3+ and a generative adversarial network (GAN). The smoke pixels were first identified by fusing the result Deeplabv3+ and the heatmap of smoke based on HSV features.…”
Section: Early Fire Detection Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works classify the fire and non-fire region from the image dataset [10,22]. It is broadly categorized into two groups: fire detection (flame detection) [23][24][25] and early fire detection (smoke detection) [26][27][28]. The former detection is challenging, as the smoke persists for hours even after the fire stops, thus making real fire detection more complex, with acquired images or on-site.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among various quantitative indicators, the relative error rate of the predicted value of crack length is the lowest. S. Cheng [ 13 ] used the DeepLab v 3+ to segment smoke images. U. Verma [ 14 ]et al used DeepLab v 3+ for river identification and width measurement.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%