2012
DOI: 10.1149/2.003303jss
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smooth, Low-Resistance, Pinhole-Free, Conformal Ruthenium Films by Pulsed Chemical Vapor Deposition

Abstract: Ruthenium (Ru) thin films were deposited by pulsed chemical vapor deposition with precursors bis(N,N'-ditert-butylacetamidinato)ruthenium(II)dicarbonyl, ammonia and hydrogen. Low-resistance polycrystalline Ru films with bulk density were obtained. Good adhesion to SiO 2 substrates was achieved by introducing a thin layer of WN in between the Ru and the SiO 2 . Ru films only ~ 2 nm thick fully covered the WN layer without any pinholes. Deposition of Ru inside narrow holes showed that good conformality was obtai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For thin-film materials, owing to the enhanced electron scattering with grain boundaries, interfaces, and surfaces as the film thickness decreases, the thinner films usually exhibit larger electrical resistivity as compared to the thicker films. Employing a simple scattering-induced model, ,, which lumps all these scattering effects into a characteristic scattering length of t 0 , the film resistivity (ρ) follows a linear relationship with the reciprocal of film thickness (1/ t ) via ρ = ρ 0 (1 + t 0 / t ), where ρ 0 is the bulk material resistivity. Accordingly, the measured resistivity is replotted in Figure b with respect to the reciprocal of film thickness.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For thin-film materials, owing to the enhanced electron scattering with grain boundaries, interfaces, and surfaces as the film thickness decreases, the thinner films usually exhibit larger electrical resistivity as compared to the thicker films. Employing a simple scattering-induced model, ,, which lumps all these scattering effects into a characteristic scattering length of t 0 , the film resistivity (ρ) follows a linear relationship with the reciprocal of film thickness (1/ t ) via ρ = ρ 0 (1 + t 0 / t ), where ρ 0 is the bulk material resistivity. Accordingly, the measured resistivity is replotted in Figure b with respect to the reciprocal of film thickness.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest obtained resistivity was found to be 0.78 mΩ cm for 40 nm thick films, and the resistivity increased as the films became thinner because of the increased probability for the electrons to scatter with surfaces, interfaces, and grain boundaries. Based on a scattering-induced model, ,, the resistivity ρ of the cobalt carbide may be expressed as ρ = ρ 0 (1 + t 0 / t ), where t is the film thickness, ρ 0 is the bulk resistivity, and t 0 is the characteristic electron scattering length to take into account the scattering effects from surfaces, interfaces, and grain boundaries. Accordingly, we plotted the resistivity ρ versus 1/ t and conducted the linear fitting as shown in Figure b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrathin continuous films without any voids are needed when Ru is used as a diffusion barrier for Cu interconnects. [27][28][29][30] The application of Ru as a conducting interconnect material requires Ru with low resistivity and low impurity contents. 18 ALD processes typically consist of the alternating dosing of precursor and coreactant gasses that interact with a substrate through self-limiting surface reactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%