2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2018.04.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoothing algorithm for stabilization of the material point method for fluid–solid interaction problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its robustness and ease of implementation, MPM is known to develop errors that can produce spurious material flows 51 . In this work, we seek to examine and reduce these errors, with a particular focus on simulations involving extreme shear deformations of the continuum material.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite its robustness and ease of implementation, MPM is known to develop errors that can produce spurious material flows 51 . In this work, we seek to examine and reduce these errors, with a particular focus on simulations involving extreme shear deformations of the continuum material.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this analysis, we use the standard, bi‐linear basis functions integrated using uGIMP; bi‐quadratic B‐spline basis functions 53 integrated with one‐point quadrature; or bi‐cubic B‐spline basis functions 53 integrated with one‐point quadrature. To avoid the issues associated with kinematic locking and strain‐based instabilities common to many MPM frameworks, we implement a cell‐based stabilization and anti‐locking algorithm 51 for this problem. This algorithm is discussed further in the Appendix.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A key advantage of MPM is that it naturally captures Lagrangian flow features by using persistent material point tracers while solving the equations of motion on a temporary Eulerian grid. Despite its proven robustness in modeling many solid-like materials through large deformations, MPM is known to develop substantial integration errors when these deformations continue to grow, as occurs with pure fluids and mixtures with negligible solid volume fractions; these quadrature errors increase the rate of overall error growth during a simulation, limiting the use of MPM for long-duration fluid problems (see [34,35,36,37,38]). Although substantial work has been done to reduce these errors in MPM (see [39,40,41,42,43,44,45]), it is desirable to avoid them completely where possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [120] for an application of this capability, where oscillations due to excess of pore water pressure in consolidation problems are smoothed out by using this technique. The employment of smoothing algorithms is also straightforward in the fluid-solid interaction problems [169]. This behaviour was noticed previously by [8], were authors highlighted how, by adjusting the spatial variation of β(x), it is possible to select regions of the domain of analysis which are treated by finite elements and regions that are treated in the style of meshfree methods, with seamless transitions between those regions.…”
Section: Local Max-ent Approximantsmentioning
confidence: 79%