Proceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2009
DOI: 10.1145/1571941.1572003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoothing clickthrough data for web search ranking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the click-through data includes a score that is derived from the number of clicks the query yields for a single document. Gao et al [15] follow a similar approach, but add smoothing to click-through data to counter sparsity issues. Amitay et al [1] study the effectiveness of query reformulations for document expansion by appending all queries in a reformulation session to the top-k returned documents for the last query.…”
Section: Document Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the click-through data includes a score that is derived from the number of clicks the query yields for a single document. Gao et al [15] follow a similar approach, but add smoothing to click-through data to counter sparsity issues. Amitay et al [1] study the effectiveness of query reformulations for document expansion by appending all queries in a reformulation session to the top-k returned documents for the last query.…”
Section: Document Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Xu et al, 2010), a method is proposed, which automatically detects judgment errors by using the click-through data. The sparseness of the click-through data is a major challenge in learning to rank approaches that have been investigated by researchers such as (Gao et al, 2009). They have proposed two techniques for expanding clickthrough features in order to address the sparseness.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, they submitted a total of 679,808 queries in 67,812 sessions. Session boundaries are drawn based on a 30-minute threshold of user inactivity as suggested by several previous studies (e.g., [9,10]). Since this work is concerned with information seeking behavior, we exclude navigational queries from our inspection in order to get a clearer impression of the difference between normal and atypical informational queries.…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%