2019
DOI: 10.1080/15140326.2019.1596641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoothing, discounting, and demand for intra-household control for recipients of conditional cash transfers

Abstract: Inter-temporal preferences are important determinants of investment decisions, including investments in human capital. Yet, little is known about these preferences for recipients of conditional cash transfers (CCTs). We simultaneously estimate utility curvature (preference for consumption smoothing), discounting, and present biasedness for such recipients. We also introduce a financially motivated method of measuring willingness to forgo funds to control household finances. We find that female participants in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results highlight significant differences between intra-and interhousehold transfers where the former lean towards more productive (investmenttype) goods. This conclusion supports the policy design of conditional cash transfers programs based on the intra-household transfer hypothesis (see, for instance recently, Bergolo andGalván 2018 andAycinena et al 2019).…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Referencessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Our results highlight significant differences between intra-and interhousehold transfers where the former lean towards more productive (investmenttype) goods. This conclusion supports the policy design of conditional cash transfers programs based on the intra-household transfer hypothesis (see, for instance recently, Bergolo andGalván 2018 andAycinena et al 2019).…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Referencessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…To maximize comparability, we restricted attention to female ENCOVI respondents in a comparable age bracket. For detailed results of this comparison, see Aycinena et al ( 2015 ). Not surprisingly, there are limitations with the comparison between our sample and the ENCOVI data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%