2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3683-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoothing Spline ANOVA Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
283
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 402 publications
(285 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
283
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the GCV function is almost flat around its minimum, it may lead to very small values of λ (undersmoothing). A lower limit on λ that controls undersmoothing can be achieved by multiplying the trace term in (A.3) by a constant k > 1 (Friedman & Silverman 1989;Gu 2002).…”
Section: Appendix A: Automatic Choice Of the Regularization Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the GCV function is almost flat around its minimum, it may lead to very small values of λ (undersmoothing). A lower limit on λ that controls undersmoothing can be achieved by multiplying the trace term in (A.3) by a constant k > 1 (Friedman & Silverman 1989;Gu 2002).…”
Section: Appendix A: Automatic Choice Of the Regularization Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A contribution index, that treats forestry profits as an objective function, based solely on main effects (Gu 2002), was also calculated: (7) where: C i -contribution index of the ratio of short rotation (i = 1) to long rotation (i = 2),…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Tikhonov regularization, it is known [57,95,98] that, with uncorrelated errors, GCV is asymptotically optimal with respect to the prediction risk as the number of data points m → ∞, i.e. the inefficiency goes to 1.…”
Section: Generalized Cross-validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GCV method has also been extended in other directions, including to non-Gaussian data [57] and to wavelet thresholding [80]. It can also be applied to iterative regularization methods, in particular the conjugate gradient method [67,71], Krylov methods [87], the ART method [126] and the iteratively regularized Gauss-Newton method [59,142].…”
Section: Generalized Cross-validationmentioning
confidence: 99%