2013
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2013.2256339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SMOS Level 2 Retrieval Algorithm Over Forests: Description and Generation of Global Maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4.1 were obtained with SMOS-IC L-VOD, only the latter is considered in the following. The relationship between tree height and IC L-VOD was found to be close to linear with a high Pearson 5 correlation coefficient (R = 0.87, Table 1), in agreement with previous findings using SMOS L2 data Rahmoune et al (2013).…”
Section: Comparison Of Smos Ic L-vod To Other Data Setssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…4.1 were obtained with SMOS-IC L-VOD, only the latter is considered in the following. The relationship between tree height and IC L-VOD was found to be close to linear with a high Pearson 5 correlation coefficient (R = 0.87, Table 1), in agreement with previous findings using SMOS L2 data Rahmoune et al (2013).…”
Section: Comparison Of Smos Ic L-vod To Other Data Setssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The r 2 correlation coefficient computed for Africa is slightly lower than for South America, probably due to the heterogeneity of the African landscape compared to the South American one, with the former characterized by high fragmentation of land cover types and presence of several water bodies. We remark that in the previous versions of the algorithm, the water presence caused retrieval failures in extended areas of Congo (Rahmoune, Ferrazzoli, Kerr, & Richaume, 2013). Discrepancies in New Guinea, already observed in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Forest Heightmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…For the specific case of developed forests, the optical depth is relatively high (in the range 0.6-1.2) which makes the retrieval of SM difficult. In fact, for equal to 0.6, the sensitivity of brightness temperature to variations of SM ( ) is in the range ), depending on angle and polarization [3]. An SM variation equal to corresponds to a brightness temperature variation in a range of 2.4-3.0 K, which can be comparable with the noise in the measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%