2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

So you have a stable child welfare workforce — What's next?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants in this sample also, generally, had worked in the CWS for relatively long periods of time—on average 13.5 years. National data indicate this is atypical, with annual child welfare turnover rates as high as 23–60%; however, it is consistent with other reports of Connecticut’s child welfare workforce due to the state’s very low turnover rate (8% or less annually) attributed to high salaries and relatively low caseloads compared with other regions (Strand, Spath, & Bosco-Ruggiero, 2010). Understanding the implications of trauma-informed care for other CWSs with high turnover rates needs further exploration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Participants in this sample also, generally, had worked in the CWS for relatively long periods of time—on average 13.5 years. National data indicate this is atypical, with annual child welfare turnover rates as high as 23–60%; however, it is consistent with other reports of Connecticut’s child welfare workforce due to the state’s very low turnover rate (8% or less annually) attributed to high salaries and relatively low caseloads compared with other regions (Strand, Spath, & Bosco-Ruggiero, 2010). Understanding the implications of trauma-informed care for other CWSs with high turnover rates needs further exploration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Studies are needed to identify the intermediate linkages between proficient organizational culture, low caseworker turnover, and youth outcomes. Several recent initiatives focused on improving caseworker training and retention have developed an infrastructure that may support these types of studies (Strand, Spath, & Bosco-Ruggiero, 2010). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Department of Health and Human Services, 2011). Of the many system-level factors cited as potential causes of ineffectiveness, high caseworker turnover has received the most attention (Strand, Spath, & Bosco-Ruggiero, 2010; Strolin, McCarthy, & Caringi, 2007; U.S. General Accounting Office [GAO], 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, an organization that values shared decision-making and staff autonomy buoys a healthier system of care and operations for its workers (Hales et al, 2017). Further, staff satisfaction has been shown to relate to organizational commitment and, in turn, increased retention and performance (Brown & Peterson, 1993;Koys, 2001;Meyer, Stanley, Herscovitch, & Topolnytsky, 2002;Strand, Spath, & Bosco-Ruggiero, 2010). Essentially, Fallot and Harris's (2009) framework has the potential, vis-à-vis staff satisfaction, to lead to high-performing agencies with longer term staff.…”
Section: Impact On Staffmentioning
confidence: 99%