Sobre formas de tratamento no Português Europeu e Brasileiro

Nascimento, Maria Fernanda Bacelar do; Duarte, Eugênia; Mendes, Amália

doi:10.35520/diadorim.2018.v20n0a23276

Cited by 12 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Both Portuguese and Turkish are quite rich languages in terms of the variety of forms used in formal and informal address between interlocutors. The use of nominal forms of address in various formal and informal contexts has been shown by previous research for Portuguese (see Carreira 1997Carreira , 2001Carreira , 2002Carreira , 2004Carreira , 2007Cunha and Cintra 2014;Duarte 2011;Manole 2011;Lopes 2017;Nascimento, Mendes, and Duarte 2018;Pratas 2017;Allen 2019) and Turkish (See İmamova, 2010;Keser 2018;Y. Özezen 2019).…”

Section: Forms Of Address In Portuguese and Turkishmentioning

confidence: 64%

Translation of forms of address from Portuguese to Turkish through English: The case of José Saramago’s A Jangada de Pedra

Carvalho

2021

stridon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study of forms of address in translation is a type of register analysis that provides an interesting insight into the way specific linguistic patterns are transferred from one language to another. This article explores how the forms of address are rendered in the Turkish translation of A Jangada de Pedra (1986) by the Portuguese author José Saramago. Paratextual and textual analyses demonstrate that this work has been translated into Turkish through the English translation of the book, and that the English translation has influenced the choices of the Turkish translator. The findings of the study seem to support the hypothesis that using a mediating language/text that lacks similar forms of address as the ultimate source and the target languages/texts can cause shifts in tenor, which results in a different reading of interpersonal relationships between fictional characters in the target text.

show abstract

Section: Forms Of Address In Portuguese and Turkishmentioning

confidence: 64%

Translation of forms of address from Portuguese to Turkish through English: The case of José Saramago’s A Jangada de Pedra

Carvalho

2021

stridon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Apesar da imprecisão que o termo Sociolinguística ainda possa trazer, Monteiro (2000) propõe duas perspetivas para o seu estudo. Uma primeira abordagem foca-se nas relações entre a sociedade e as línguas como uma unidade e volta-se a questões como políticas linguísticas em comunidades multilingues, por exemplo.…”

Section: A Sociolinguística Variacionistaunclassified

Formalidade e pronomes de segunda pessoa do singular no português gaúcho

Pereira

2024

Rev. Est. Ling.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo: Na variedade do português falado no estado do Rio Grande do Sul, o pronome de segunda pessoa do singular "tu" ocorre com maior frequência do que o pronome inovador "você", sendo o "tu" considerado marca da identidade local. No entanto, vem geralmente acompanhado de verbos com a flexão de terceira pessoa, tendo sido sugerido que a utilização da flexão canónica está reservada a momentos de maior formalidade. Este estudo propôs-se a obter dados empíricos acerca da perceção de formalidade dos diferentes pronomes de segunda pessoa do português gaúcho pelos seus falantes nativos, além de estabelecer se consideram o pronome "tu" parte do seu jeito de falar. Uma tarefa de seleção de vocábulos, além de uma tarefa de julgamento de formalidade com uma escala de cinco pontos foram realizadas com 233 participantes. Os resultados confirmam a visão de que o pronome "tu" faz parte da identidade dos falantes e sugerem um sistema triádico, composto, em ordem de formalidade por "tu", "você" e "o senhor", acompanhados de morfologia flexional de terceira pessoa, enquanto "tu" com a flexão canónica compete com "você" pela posição intermédia. Dentre os fatores sociolinguísticos que influenciam os julgamentos, somente a idade foi relevante, com os participantes acima de 50 anos de idade tendendo a considerar as frases com "tu" mais informais, independentemente da flexão a ele associada. Palavras-chave: pronomes de segunda pessoa; formalidade; português brasileiro; português gaúcho; sociolinguística.

show abstract

“…In the realm of the nominal format, it is also important to note that o senhor/a senhora are semi-pronominalised forms (Cintra 1972;Duarte and Marques 2023;Nascimento et al 2018) and show signs of clear grammaticalisation, namely semantic bleaching and an increasing deictic value, in addition to syntactic functions close to pronouns, as explained by Duarte and Marques (2023). They also elucidate that o senhor/a senhora, like personal pronouns, perform the function of a subject or complement and are fully integrated into the sentence structure (Duarte and Marques 2023, p. 300).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…This seeming grammatical inconsistency is fully echoed in the variegated pragmatic effects of você, which, on the one hand, may lend itself to interactions where a fairly neutral, socially distant form is necessary or to situations where speakers may wish to avoid the T pronoun tu whilst maintaining an equality-based address occupying a middle ground between intimacy and distance (Cintra 1972;Hummel 2020). However, on the other hand, você is often seen as an intrinsically impolite pronoun, potentially causing offence and often avoided for the same reason (Carreira 2004;Duarte 2011;Guilherme and Lara-Bermejo 2015;Hammermüller 2004;Lara and Guilherme 2018;Nascimento et al 2018;Oliveira 1994Oliveira , 2009. Explanations for this negative assessment of você are difficult to ascertain and, again, as shown by the Jesus case, this pronoun is a sign of the complexity and even 'confusion' affecting the EP address system nowadays (Gouveia 2008;Roque and Pinto 2023).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceptions of Forms of Address in European Portuguese in Online Metadiscourse or What Happens When You Use você in Court

Faria

2024

Languages

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The point of departure for this study is an incident in 2020 when a football manager testifying in a Lisbon court used the pronoun address você and was reprimanded. With the aid of corpus linguistics, we qualitatively analyse the comments (understood as metacomments) that this case generated on media outlets and social media. The main conclusion is that the sociocultural foundations of EP address are polarised and unstable based on the following: the nexus between forms of address and the expression of (im)politeness is often rejected, with concerns that a complex system of address might impede an egalitarian society; despite this, discernment remains a core facet, expressed in the concern of finding appropriate sociolinguistic rules so as to arrive at forms understood as intrinsically (im)polite. Furthermore, a binary T/V dimension does not apply to the EP system, and although a N(neutral) dimension should be added, the polarised perceptions of EP address preclude clear candidates not only for the N platform but also, to an extent, for the V dimension. Fifty years after the 1974 ‘Carnation’ Revolution that initiated the transition to democracy in Portugal, EP conceptualisations of address show that sociocultural concerns for an egalitarian society coexist with persistent concerns for hierarchy and rules.

show abstract

Sobre formas de tratamento no Português Europeu e Brasileiro

Cited by 12 publications

References 0 publications

Translation of forms of address from Portuguese to Turkish through English: The case of José Saramago’s A Jangada de Pedra

Translation of forms of address from Portuguese to Turkish through English: The case of José Saramago’s A Jangada de Pedra

Formalidade e pronomes de segunda pessoa do singular no português gaúcho

Perceptions of Forms of Address in European Portuguese in Online Metadiscourse or What Happens When You Use você in Court

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About