Social Acceptance of Robots in Different Occupational Fields: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Robots today are working in both industrial and service sectors. Robots have evolved from one-function automatons to intelligent systems of versatile features, and the new generation of service robots are sharing same space and tasks with humans. The aim of this systematic literature review was to examine how the social acceptance of robots in different occupational fields has been studied and what kinds of attitudes the studies have discovered regarding robots as workers. The data were collected in October 2016 from four major bibliographic databases. Preliminary search results included 336 research articles from which 42 were selected to the final research through inclusion criteria. Of the studies, 69 percent concerned robots working in health and social services. Positive attitudes occurred more frequently in studies exposing participants to robots. Robots were considered appropriate for different work tasks. Telepresence robots were highly approved by health care staff. The criticism was directed to decreasing human contact and unnecessary deployment of new technology. Our results imply that attitudes toward robots are positive in many fields of work. Yet there is a need for validated measures and nationally representative data that would help us to further our understanding of social acceptance of robots in work.

Care Workers’ Readiness for Robotization: Identifying Psychological and Socio-Demographic Determinants

“…Care workers and organizations are witnessing a pervasive and ongoing technological change. Care robots are gradually being introduced to care of older people with the aim to optimize and facilitate nursing work and also assist the older people themselves [1,2]. Due to this development, the staff's robotization readiness is a crucial factor determining the future care work [3,4].…”

Finnish healthcare professionals' attitudes towards robots: Reflections on a population sample

“…Remotely operated robots are more positively appraised than autonomous robots (Savela, Turja, & Oksanen, 2017). Healthcare professionals see exceptional potential in telepresence robots used in telecare (Koceski & Koceska, 2016;Kristoffersson, Coradeschi, Loutfi, & Severinson-Eklundh, 2011).…”

The Parasitic Nature of Social AI: Sharing Minds with the Mindless

“…Latikka et al (2019) examine robot acceptance in general and show that men are more accepting than women, younger people more so than their elders, and that people with more experience with technology are also more prone to accept robots. There are differences between different kinds of robots, however, and it seems that industrial robots are easier to accept than, for example, care robots (Savela et al 2018;Latikka et al 2019).…”