2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10708-009-9270-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social actors and their role in metropolitan governance in Montréal: towards an inclusive coalition?

Abstract: The article is about the role of civil society organizations in the governance of the Montréal metropolitan region. It identifies a high level of cooperation around metropolitan scale issues on the part of these organizations. In the Montréal region, government agencies as well as private corporations demonstrate readiness to work alongside civil society organizations on joint projects. Evidence of this type of collaboration is particularly strong in the case of economic development, neighbourhood revitalizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The early CDECs received substantial grants from provincial and federal governments, but their activity was strongly driven by local civil society actors (Fontan et al 2006). Though each of the early CDECs engaged in different work depending on neighbourhood priorities, most of them funded revitalization efforts, employment and training programs for the excluded, and venture capital for small to medium enterprises (Klein and Tremblay 2010). Building on the success of the early CDECs, in 1990 the Montreal municipal government extended CDECs to all neighbourhoods except the downtown core, and forged an agreement between all three levels of government to recognize and finance the CDECs (Fontan et al 2006).…”
Section: Quebec Case: Changing Patterns Of Metagovernance Of Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early CDECs received substantial grants from provincial and federal governments, but their activity was strongly driven by local civil society actors (Fontan et al 2006). Though each of the early CDECs engaged in different work depending on neighbourhood priorities, most of them funded revitalization efforts, employment and training programs for the excluded, and venture capital for small to medium enterprises (Klein and Tremblay 2010). Building on the success of the early CDECs, in 1990 the Montreal municipal government extended CDECs to all neighbourhoods except the downtown core, and forged an agreement between all three levels of government to recognize and finance the CDECs (Fontan et al 2006).…”
Section: Quebec Case: Changing Patterns Of Metagovernance Of Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was emphasised by Mason (2003) and Klein and Tremblay (2009), in regard to the revitalisation of the 'Quartier International', the City of Montreal is implementing a distinctive planning and governance model in Canada, still driven by economic competitiveness but also characterised by a commitment towards social cohesion. This statement is also true for the case study of the 'Quartier des Spectacles' to a certain extent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La restructuration des économies urbaines dépendrait des coalitions que les acteurs privés et publics parviennent à constituer, ainsi que de la stabilité de ces coalitions (Kantor et al, 1997). Or, s'il a souvent été constaté que les coalitions de croissance prennent une forme élitiste, qui exclut les acteurs sociaux (Deitrick, 1999), des applications plus récentes de ce concept ont servi à proposer des coalitions plus larges et cohésives (Stone, 2004;Moulaert et al, 2007), ce qui, dans le cas de Montréal, est d'ailleurs réclamé par les acteurs sociaux (Klein et Tremblay, 2010). Ces coalitions inclusives viseraient moins à rendre la ville plus compétitive qu'à améliorer les conditions de vie des citoyens dans les quartiers et dans la ville en général.…”
Section: Problématique : La Cohésion Sociale Et La Cohésion Territoriunclassified